Advertisement
GTLB vs HUBS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTLB is a Hold and HUBS is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GTLB’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHUBS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- GTLB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- HUBS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GTLB’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HUBS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- GTLB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
- HUBS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
GTLB (@Computer Communications) experienced а -2.42% price change this week, while HUBS (@Packaged Software) price change was -9.37% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -0.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.30%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +69.23%.
Reported Earning Dates
GTLB is expected to report earnings on Mar 16, 2026.
HUBS is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Computer Communications (-0.18% weekly)Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.
@Packaged Software (-1.61% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| GTLB | HUBS | GTLB / HUBS | |
| Capitalization | 6.04B | 18.8B | 32% |
| EBITDA | -73.73M | 149M | -49% |
| Gain YTD | -4.476 | -10.568 | 42% |
| P/E Ratio | 521.22 | 7023.44 | 7% |
| Revenue | 906M | 2.99B | 30% |
| Total Cash | 1.2B | 1.49B | 81% |
| Total Debt | 392K | 272M | 0% |
HUBS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 11 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 100 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 90 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 83 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 80 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 90 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| GTLB | HUBS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 69% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 69% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 77% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 81% | 10 days ago 69% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 77% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| MHN | 10.36 | 0.03 | +0.34% |
| Blackrock Muniholdings NEW York Quality Fund | |||
| CGSD | 26.03 | 0.02 | +0.10% |
| Capital Group Short Duration Income ETF | |||
| HWAY | 32.76 | N/A | N/A |
| Themes US Infrastructure ETF | |||
| SPXN | 75.44 | -0.02 | -0.03% |
| ProShares S&P 500® ex-Financials | |||
| WTID | 10.19 | -0.33 | -3.10% |
| MicroSectors™ Energy -3X Invrs Lvrgd ETN | |||
GTLB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GTLB has been loosely correlated with HUBS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GTLB jumps, then HUBS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GTLB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTLB | 100% | +0.53% | ||
| HUBS - GTLB | 60% Loosely correlated | -4.54% | ||
| TEAM - GTLB | 59% Loosely correlated | -5.84% | ||
| COIN - GTLB | 59% Loosely correlated | +4.00% | ||
| FRSH - GTLB | 56% Loosely correlated | -3.39% | ||
| NOW - GTLB | 56% Loosely correlated | -3.12% | ||
More | ||||
HUBS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HUBS has been closely correlated with CRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HUBS jumps, then CRM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HUBS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HUBS | 100% | -4.54% | ||
| CRM - HUBS | 73% Closely correlated | -7.07% | ||
| TEAM - HUBS | 71% Closely correlated | -5.84% | ||
| S - HUBS | 66% Loosely correlated | -2.66% | ||
| FRSH - HUBS | 65% Loosely correlated | -3.39% | ||
| CLSK - HUBS | 65% Loosely correlated | +4.93% | ||
More | ||||