GTIM
Price
$1.64
Change
-$0.01 (-0.61%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
17.3M
77 days until earnings call
SG
Price
$8.32
Change
-$0.02 (-0.24%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
983.52M
41 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

GTIM vs SG

Header iconGTIM vs SG Comparison
Open Charts GTIM vs SGBanner chart's image
Good Times Restaurants
Price$1.64
Change-$0.01 (-0.61%)
Volume$10.67K
Capitalization17.3M
Sweetgreen
Price$8.32
Change-$0.02 (-0.24%)
Volume$3.64M
Capitalization983.52M
GTIM vs SG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GTIM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GTIM vs. SG commentary
Sep 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTIM is a StrongBuy and SG is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 25, 2025
Stock price -- (GTIM: $1.64 vs. SG: $8.32)
Brand notoriety: GTIM and SG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GTIM: 36% vs. SG: 56%
Market capitalization -- GTIM: $17.3M vs. SG: $983.52M
GTIM [@Restaurants] is valued at $17.3M. SG’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $983.52M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $217.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $7.71B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GTIM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GTIM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GTIM is a better buy in the long-term than SG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GTIM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GTIM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SG is a better buy in the short-term than GTIM.

Price Growth

GTIM (@Restaurants) experienced а +1.86% price change this week, while SG (@Restaurants) price change was -4.48% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -0.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.98%.

Reported Earning Dates

GTIM is expected to report earnings on Dec 11, 2025.

SG is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-0.11% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SG($984M) has a higher market cap than GTIM($17.3M). GTIM YTD gains are higher at: -36.680 vs. SG (-74.049). GTIM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.86M vs. SG (-29.06M). SG has more cash in the bank: 168M vs. GTIM (3.14M). GTIM has less debt than SG: GTIM (43.2M) vs SG (339M). SG has higher revenues than GTIM: SG (686M) vs GTIM (143M).
GTIMSGGTIM / SG
Capitalization17.3M984M2%
EBITDA4.86M-29.06M-17%
Gain YTD-36.680-74.04950%
P/E Ratio13.67N/A-
Revenue143M686M21%
Total Cash3.14M168M2%
Total Debt43.2M339M13%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GTIM vs SG: Fundamental Ratings
GTIM
SG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6358
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
48
Fair valued
100
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
8796
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8595
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9570
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GTIM's Valuation (48) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SG (100) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that GTIM’s stock grew somewhat faster than SG’s over the last 12 months.

GTIM's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as SG (100) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that GTIM’s stock grew similarly to SG’s over the last 12 months.

GTIM's SMR Rating (87) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as SG (96) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that GTIM’s stock grew similarly to SG’s over the last 12 months.

GTIM's Price Growth Rating (85) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as SG (95) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that GTIM’s stock grew similarly to SG’s over the last 12 months.

SG's P/E Growth Rating (70) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as GTIM (95) in the Restaurants industry. This means that SG’s stock grew similarly to GTIM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GTIMSG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GTIM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
XAIR2.460.15
+6.49%
Beyond Air Inc
IPHA1.840.04
+2.22%
Innate Pharma SA
TSCO57.35-1.21
-2.07%
Tractor Supply Co
SERV12.84-0.33
-2.51%
Serve Robotics
NSIT114.16-3.08
-2.63%
Insight Enterprises

GTIM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GTIM and KRUS have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GTIM and KRUS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GTIM
1D Price
Change %
GTIM100%
-0.61%
KRUS - GTIM
28%
Poorly correlated
-2.42%
SG - GTIM
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.24%
SGLOF - GTIM
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PTLO - GTIM
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.79%
RICK - GTIM
24%
Poorly correlated
+9.18%
More

SG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SG has been loosely correlated with CAVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SG jumps, then CAVA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SG
1D Price
Change %
SG100%
-0.24%
CAVA - SG
55%
Loosely correlated
-2.64%
CMG - SG
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.33%
KRUS - SG
43%
Loosely correlated
-2.42%
SHAK - SG
40%
Loosely correlated
-2.79%
BROS - SG
35%
Loosely correlated
-2.28%
More