Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GTILX vs RGABX
GTILX vs RGABX Comparison
Open Charts GTILX vs RGABX
Glenmede Disciplined USGrEqPtf InstlShrs
Price$30.97
Change-$0.68 (-2.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.24B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2
Price$77.25
Change-$1.73 (-2.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.4B
GTILX vs RGABX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GTILX vs. RGABX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTILX is a StrongBuy and RGABX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. GTILX (1.24B). GTILX (0.00) and RGABX (0.00) have matching dividends . GTILX was incepted earlier than RGABX: GTILX (10 years) vs RGABX (24 years). RGABX (1.39) is less costly to investors than GTILX (0.66). GTILX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. RGABX (25.00). RGABX has a lower initial minimum investment than GTILX: RGABX (250) vs GTILX (10000000). RGABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.12 vs. GTILX (-15.58). RGABX return over 5 years is better than : 32.14 vs. GTILX (-7.36).
| GTILX | RGABX | GTILX / RGABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.39 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.39 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.483 | 18.910 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000000 | 250 | 4,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.24B | 340B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -15.58 | 7.12 | -219% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.95 | 58.91 | 17% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.36 | 32.14 | -23% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.43 | 85.88 | 46% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement