Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GTILX vs RGABX
GTILX vs RGABX Comparison
Open Charts GTILX vs RGABX
Glenmede Disciplined USGrEqPtf InstlShrs
Price$31.59
Change-$0.49 (-1.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.23B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2
Price$78.51
Change-$1.23 (-1.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
GTILX vs RGABX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GTILX vs. RGABX commentary
Dec 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTILX is a Buy and RGABX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. GTILX (1.23B). GTILX (0.00) and RGABX (0.00) have matching dividends . GTILX was incepted earlier than RGABX: GTILX (10 years) vs RGABX (24 years). RGABX (1.38) is less costly to investors than GTILX (0.66). GTILX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. RGABX (32.00). RGABX has a lower initial minimum investment than GTILX: RGABX (250) vs GTILX (10000000). RGABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.10 vs. GTILX (-17.68). RGABX return over 5 years is better than : 25.91 vs. GTILX (-8.20).
| GTILX | RGABX | GTILX / RGABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.38 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.38 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.079 | 20.054 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000000 | 250 | 4,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.23B | 339B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -17.68 | 5.10 | -347% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.41 | 62.64 | 18% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.20 | 25.91 | -32% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.67 | 87.27 | 45% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement