Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GTILX vs RGABX
GTILX vs RGABX Comparison
Open Charts GTILX vs RGABX
Glenmede Disciplined USGrEqPtf InstlShrs
Price$27.45
Change-$0.50 (-1.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.22B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2
Price$69.54
Change-$0.84 (-1.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets306.22B
GTILX vs RGABX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GTILX vs. RGABX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTILX is a Buy and RGABX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 306B vs. GTILX (1.22B). GTILX (0.00) and RGABX (0.00) have matching dividends . GTILX was incepted earlier than RGABX: GTILX (10 years) vs RGABX (23 years). RGABX (1.39) is less costly to investors than GTILX (0.66). GTILX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. RGABX (25.00). RGABX has a lower initial minimum investment than GTILX: RGABX (250) vs GTILX (10000000). RGABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.71 vs. GTILX (-20.02). RGABX return over 5 years is better than : 40.63 vs. GTILX (-7.39).
| GTILX | RGABX | GTILX / RGABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.39 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.39 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.893 | 4.697 | 40% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000000 | 250 | 4,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.22B | 306B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -20.02 | 6.71 | -299% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.14 | 47.80 | 9% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.39 | 40.63 | -18% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 59.02 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement