Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GTILX vs RGABX
GTILX vs RGABX Comparison
Open Charts GTILX vs RGABX
Glenmede Disciplined USGrEqPtf InstlShrs
Price$29.80
Change+$0.15 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.24B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2
Price$76.49
Change+$0.17 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
GTILX vs RGABX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GTILX vs. RGABX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTILX is a Buy and RGABX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. GTILX (1.24B). GTILX (0.00) and RGABX (0.00) have matching dividends . GTILX was incepted earlier than RGABX: GTILX (10 years) vs RGABX (23 years). RGABX (1.39) is less costly to investors than GTILX (0.66). GTILX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. RGABX (25.00). RGABX has a lower initial minimum investment than GTILX: RGABX (250) vs GTILX (10000000). RGABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.53 vs. GTILX (-12.15). RGABX return over 5 years is better than : 34.12 vs. GTILX (-7.98).
| GTILX | RGABX | GTILX / RGABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.39 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.39 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.616 | 15.161 | 70% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000000 | 250 | 4,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.24B | 332B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.15 | 16.53 | -73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.79 | 54.24 | 14% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.98 | 34.12 | -23% |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.81 | 83.61 | 64% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement