Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GTDYX vs RNWHX
GTDYX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts GTDYX vs RNWHX
Invesco Emerging Markets ex-China Y
Price$39.05
Change-$0.46 (-1.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.16B
American Funds New World R5E
Price$97.53
Change+$2.43 (+2.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.46B
GTDYX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GTDYX vs. RNWHX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTDYX is a StrongBuy and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. GTDYX (1.16B). GTDYX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: GTDYX (3.60) vs RNWHX (1.25). GTDYX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: GTDYX (17 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). GTDYX (1.14) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). GTDYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 96.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than GTDYX: RNWHX (250) vs GTDYX (1000). RNWHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.68 vs. GTDYX (24.66). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 11.69 vs. GTDYX (-4.84).
| GTDYX | RNWHX | GTDYX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.72 | 158% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.72 | 158% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.859 | 6.092 | 195% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.16B | 75.5B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.60 | 1.25 | 287% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.66 | 27.68 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.84 | 43.24 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.84 | 11.69 | -41% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.81 | 124.21 | 74% |