Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GTDYX vs RNWBX
GTDYX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts GTDYX vs RNWBX
Invesco Emerging Markets ex-China Y
Price$34.70
Change+$0.32 (+0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.05B
American Funds New World R2
Price$88.91
Change+$0.20 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.3B
GTDYX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GTDYX vs. RNWBX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTDYX is a StrongBuy and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75.3B vs. GTDYX (1.05B). GTDYX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: GTDYX (1.15) vs RNWBX (0.12). GTDYX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: GTDYX (17 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than GTDYX (1.14). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. GTDYX (20.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GTDYX: RNWBX (250) vs GTDYX (1000). RNWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.18 vs. GTDYX (4.49). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 7.90 vs. GTDYX (-12.37).
| GTDYX | RNWBX | GTDYX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.67 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.67 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.149 | 20.884 | 29% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.05B | 75.3B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 0.12 | 977% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.49 | 19.18 | 23% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.49 | 41.02 | 35% |
| Returns for 5 years | -12.37 | 7.90 | -157% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.73 | 82.81 | 66% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement