Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GTDIX vs RNWBX
GTDIX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts GTDIX vs RNWBX
Invesco Emerging Markets ex-China R5
Price$38.41
Change-$0.26 (-0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.26B
American Funds New World R2
Price$89.21
Change-$0.34 (-0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets73.85B
GTDIX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GTDIX vs. RNWBX commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTDIX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 73.9B vs. GTDIX (1.26B). GTDIX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: GTDIX (1.35) vs RNWBX (0.13). GTDIX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: GTDIX (20 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than GTDIX (1.08). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. GTDIX (20.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GTDIX: RNWBX (250) vs GTDIX (1000000). RNWBX (9.66) and GTDIX (9.30) have marching annual gain over last year. RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 28.35 vs. GTDIX (9.77).
| GTDIX | RNWBX | GTDIX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 1.67 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 1.67 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.729 | 21.292 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 1000000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.26B | 73.9B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.35 | 0.13 | 1,073% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.30 | 9.66 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.97 | 53.84 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.77 | 28.35 | 34% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.92 | 96.39 | 88% |