Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GTDFX vs RNWHX
GTDFX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts GTDFX vs RNWHX
Invesco Emerging Markets ex-China R6
Price$40.05
Change+$0.60 (+1.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.19B
American Funds New World R5E
Price$99.67
Change+$0.51 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets79.7B
GTDFX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GTDFX vs. RNWHX commentary
Feb 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTDFX is a StrongBuy and RNWHX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 79.7B vs. GTDFX (1.19B). GTDFX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: GTDFX (3.77) vs RNWHX (1.25). GTDFX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: GTDFX (13 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). GTDFX (1.01) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). GTDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 96.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than GTDFX: RNWHX (250) vs GTDFX (1000000). RNWHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.49 vs. GTDFX (26.11). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 9.87 vs. GTDFX (-4.19).
| GTDFX | RNWHX | GTDFX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.72 | 140% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.72 | 140% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.451 | 8.419 | 184% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.19B | 79.7B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.77 | 1.25 | 301% |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.11 | 28.49 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.91 | 48.86 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.19 | 9.87 | -42% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.70 | 135.68 | 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers