Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GTDFX vs RNWHX
GTDFX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts GTDFX vs RNWHX
Invesco Emerging Markets ex-China R6
Price$38.65
Change-$0.24 (-0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.27B
American Funds New World R5E
Price$92.86
Change-$0.35 (-0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.45B
GTDFX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GTDFX vs. RNWHX commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTDFX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 74.4B vs. GTDFX (1.27B). GTDFX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: GTDFX (1.42) vs RNWHX (0.97). GTDFX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: GTDFX (13 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). GTDFX (1.01) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. GTDFX (20.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than GTDFX: RNWHX (250) vs GTDFX (1000000). GTDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.51 vs. RNWHX (11.23). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 33.76 vs. GTDFX (10.81).
| GTDFX | RNWHX | GTDFX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.72 | 140% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.72 | 140% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.551 | 22.612 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.27B | 74.4B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.42 | 0.97 | 146% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.51 | 11.23 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.34 | 57.54 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.81 | 33.76 | 32% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.72 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement