Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GTDFX vs RNWBX
GTDFX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts GTDFX vs RNWBX
Invesco Emerging Markets ex-China R6
Price$34.17
Change+$0.18 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.04B
American Funds New World R2
Price$88.71
Change+$0.03 (+0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.3B
GTDFX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GTDFX vs. RNWBX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTDFX is a StrongBuy and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75.3B vs. GTDFX (1.04B). GTDFX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: GTDFX (1.27) vs RNWBX (0.12). GTDFX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: GTDFX (13 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than GTDFX (1.01). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. GTDFX (20.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GTDFX: RNWBX (250) vs GTDFX (1000000). RNWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.68 vs. GTDFX (3.11). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 7.66 vs. GTDFX (-12.85).
| GTDFX | RNWBX | GTDFX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.67 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.67 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.041 | 20.612 | 24% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.04B | 75.3B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.27 | 0.12 | 1,077% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.11 | 18.68 | 17% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.14 | 40.84 | 32% |
| Returns for 5 years | -12.85 | 7.66 | -168% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.16 | 83.29 | 66% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement