Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GTDFX vs RNWBX
GTDFX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts GTDFX vs RNWBX
Invesco Emerging Markets ex-China R6
Price$40.56
Change-$0.48 (-1.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.13B
American Funds New World R2
Price$92.33
Change-$1.19 (-1.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets76.61B
GTDFX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GTDFX vs. RNWBX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTDFX is a Buy and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 76.6B vs. GTDFX (1.13B). GTDFX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: GTDFX (1.25) vs RNWBX (0.12). GTDFX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: GTDFX (13 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than GTDFX (1.01). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. GTDFX (20.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GTDFX: RNWBX (250) vs GTDFX (1000000). GTDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.77 vs. RNWBX (20.32). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 21.37 vs. GTDFX (5.22).
| GTDFX | RNWBX | GTDFX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.67 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.67 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 26.160 | 27.152 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.13B | 76.6B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.25 | 0.12 | 1,066% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.77 | 20.32 | 122% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.11 | 47.10 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.22 | 21.37 | 24% |
| Returns for 10 years | 81.25 | 93.86 | 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement