Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GTDFX vs RNWBX
GTDFX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts GTDFX vs RNWBX
Invesco Emerging Markets ex-China R6
Price$38.65
Change-$0.24 (-0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.27B
American Funds New World R2
Price$89.55
Change-$0.71 (-0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.45B
GTDFX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GTDFX vs. RNWBX commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTDFX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 74.4B vs. GTDFX (1.27B). GTDFX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: GTDFX (1.42) vs RNWBX (0.13). GTDFX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: GTDFX (13 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than GTDFX (1.01). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. GTDFX (20.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GTDFX: RNWBX (250) vs GTDFX (1000000). GTDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.51 vs. RNWBX (10.08). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 28.84 vs. GTDFX (10.81).
| GTDFX | RNWBX | GTDFX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.67 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.67 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.551 | 21.754 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.27B | 74.4B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.42 | 0.13 | 1,128% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.51 | 10.08 | 124% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.34 | 54.43 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.81 | 28.84 | 37% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.72 | 97.14 | 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement