Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GTDFX vs RNWBX
GTDFX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts GTDFX vs RNWBX
Invesco Emerging Markets ex-China R6
Price$40.05
Change+$0.60 (+1.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.19B
American Funds New World R2
Price$96.08
Change+$0.48 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets79.7B
GTDFX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GTDFX vs. RNWBX commentary
Feb 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTDFX is a StrongBuy and RNWBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 79.7B vs. GTDFX (1.19B). GTDFX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: GTDFX (3.77) vs RNWBX (0.45). GTDFX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: GTDFX (13 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). RNWBX (1.66) is less costly to investors than GTDFX (1.01). GTDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 96.00 vs. RNWBX (46.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GTDFX: RNWBX (250) vs GTDFX (1000000). RNWBX (27.06) and GTDFX (26.11) have marching annual gain over last year. RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 5.27 vs. GTDFX (-4.19).
| GTDFX | RNWBX | GTDFX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.66 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.66 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.451 | 8.284 | 187% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.19B | 79.7B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.77 | 0.45 | 837% |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.11 | 27.06 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.91 | 44.24 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.19 | 5.27 | -79% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.70 | 125.08 | 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement