Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GTDDX vs RNWHX
GTDDX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts GTDDX vs RNWHX
Invesco Emerging Markets ex-China A
Price$36.91
Change+$0.24 (+0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.21B
American Funds New World R5E
Price$89.82
Change+$0.19 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.38B
GTDDX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GTDDX vs. RNWHX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTDDX is a Buy and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 71.4B vs. GTDDX (1.21B). GTDDX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: GTDDX (1.04) vs RNWHX (0.97). GTDDX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: GTDDX (32 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). GTDDX (1.39) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. GTDDX (20.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than GTDDX: RNWHX (250) vs GTDDX (1000). RNWHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.26 vs. GTDDX (11.59). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 26.08 vs. GTDDX (-0.11).
| GTDDX | RNWHX | GTDDX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 0.72 | 193% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 0.72 | 193% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.737 | 19.021 | 67% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.21B | 71.4B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.04 | 0.97 | 107% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.59 | 15.26 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.01 | 43.34 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.11 | 26.08 | -0% |
| Returns for 10 years | 64.99 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement