Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GTDDX vs RNWHX
GTDDX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts GTDDX vs RNWHX
Invesco Emerging Markets ex-China A
Price$39.11
Change-$0.39 (-0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.14B
American Funds New World R5E
Price$97.53
Change+$2.43 (+2.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.46B
GTDDX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GTDDX vs. RNWHX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTDDX is a StrongBuy and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. GTDDX (1.14B). GTDDX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: GTDDX (3.39) vs RNWHX (1.25). GTDDX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: GTDDX (32 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). GTDDX (1.39) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). GTDDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 96.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than GTDDX: RNWHX (250) vs GTDDX (1000). RNWHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.68 vs. GTDDX (24.41). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 11.69 vs. GTDDX (-5.99).
| GTDDX | RNWHX | GTDDX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 0.72 | 193% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 0.72 | 193% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.839 | 6.092 | 194% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.14B | 75.5B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.39 | 1.25 | 270% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.41 | 27.68 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.93 | 43.24 | 53% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.99 | 11.69 | -51% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.83 | 124.21 | 71% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement