Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GTDDX vs RNWHX
GTDDX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts GTDDX vs RNWHX
Invesco Emerging Markets ex-China A
Price$34.75
Change+$0.31 (+0.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.05B
American Funds New World R5E
Price$92.12
Change+$0.22 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.3B
GTDDX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GTDDX vs. RNWHX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTDDX is a StrongBuy and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 75.3B vs. GTDDX (1.05B). GTDDX (0.93) and RNWHX (0.91) have matching dividends . GTDDX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: GTDDX (32 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). GTDDX (1.39) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. GTDDX (20.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than GTDDX: RNWHX (250) vs GTDDX (1000). RNWHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.48 vs. GTDDX (4.48). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 11.64 vs. GTDDX (-13.26).
| GTDDX | RNWHX | GTDDX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 0.72 | 193% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 0.72 | 193% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.139 | 21.179 | 29% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.05B | 75.3B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.93 | 0.91 | 103% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.48 | 19.48 | 23% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.90 | 44.27 | 31% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.26 | 11.64 | -114% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.79 | 89.73 | 58% |