Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GTDDX vs RNWBX
GTDDX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts GTDDX vs RNWBX
Invesco Emerging Markets ex-China A
Price$39.75
Change+$0.19 (+0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.18B
American Funds New World R2
Price$90.79
Change-$0.09 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.73B
GTDDX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GTDDX vs. RNWBX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTDDX is a StrongBuy and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 74.7B vs. GTDDX (1.18B). GTDDX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: GTDDX (0.98) vs RNWBX (0.12). GTDDX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: GTDDX (32 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than GTDDX (1.39). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. GTDDX (20.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GTDDX: RNWBX (250) vs GTDDX (1000). GTDDX (14.82) and RNWBX (14.20) have marching annual gain over last year. RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 24.32 vs. GTDDX (6.97).
| GTDDX | RNWBX | GTDDX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 1.67 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 1.67 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.411 | 23.440 | 91% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.18B | 74.7B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.98 | 0.12 | 810% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.82 | 14.20 | 104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.42 | 54.19 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.97 | 24.32 | 29% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.78 | 85.87 | 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement