Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GTDDX vs RNWBX
GTDDX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts GTDDX vs RNWBX
Invesco Emerging Markets ex-China A
Price$36.91
Change+$0.24 (+0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.21B
American Funds New World R2
Price$86.97
Change+$0.63 (+0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.38B
GTDDX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GTDDX vs. RNWBX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTDDX is a Buy and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 71.4B vs. GTDDX (1.21B). GTDDX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: GTDDX (1.04) vs RNWBX (0.13). GTDDX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: GTDDX (32 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than GTDDX (1.39). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. GTDDX (20.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GTDDX: RNWBX (250) vs GTDDX (1000). RNWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.06 vs. GTDDX (11.59). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 21.44 vs. GTDDX (-0.11).
| GTDDX | RNWBX | GTDDX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 1.67 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 1.67 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.737 | 18.246 | 70% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.21B | 71.4B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.04 | 0.13 | 827% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.59 | 14.06 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.01 | 40.53 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.11 | 21.44 | -1% |
| Returns for 10 years | 64.99 | 84.15 | 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers