Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GTDDX vs RNWBX
GTDDX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts GTDDX vs RNWBX
Invesco Emerging Markets ex-China A
Price$39.11
Change-$0.39 (-0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.14B
American Funds New World R2
Price$94.05
Change+$2.72 (+2.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.46B
GTDDX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GTDDX vs. RNWBX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTDDX is a StrongBuy and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. GTDDX (1.14B). GTDDX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: GTDDX (3.39) vs RNWBX (0.45). GTDDX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: GTDDX (32 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). RNWBX (1.66) is less costly to investors than GTDDX (1.39). GTDDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 96.00 vs. RNWBX (46.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GTDDX: RNWBX (250) vs GTDDX (1000). RNWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.27 vs. GTDDX (24.41). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 7.03 vs. GTDDX (-5.99).
| GTDDX | RNWBX | GTDDX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 1.66 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 1.66 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.839 | 5.996 | 197% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.14B | 75.5B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.39 | 0.45 | 752% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.41 | 26.27 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.93 | 38.81 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.99 | 7.03 | -85% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.83 | 114.19 | 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement