Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GTDCX vs RNWHX
GTDCX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts GTDCX vs RNWHX
Invesco Emerging Markets ex-China C
Price$37.94
Change-$0.37 (-0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.14B
American Funds New World R5E
Price$97.08
Change-$0.45 (-0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.46B
GTDCX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GTDCX vs. RNWHX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTDCX is a StrongBuy and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. GTDCX (1.15B). GTDCX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: GTDCX (2.76) vs RNWHX (1.25). GTDCX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: GTDCX (27 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). GTDCX (2.14) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). GTDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 96.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than GTDCX: RNWHX (250) vs GTDCX (1000). RNWHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.68 vs. GTDCX (20.11). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 11.69 vs. GTDCX (-11.56).
| GTDCX | RNWHX | GTDCX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.14 | 0.72 | 297% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.14 | 0.72 | 297% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.709 | 6.092 | 176% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.15B | 75.5B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.76 | 1.25 | 220% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.11 | 27.68 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.69 | 43.24 | 43% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.56 | 11.69 | -99% |
| Returns for 10 years | 73.66 | 124.21 | 59% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers