Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GTDCX vs RNWHX
GTDCX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts GTDCX vs RNWHX
Invesco Emerging Markets ex-China C
Price$37.69
Change-$0.26 (-0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.26B
American Funds New World R5E
Price$92.86
Change-$0.35 (-0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets73.85B
GTDCX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GTDCX vs. RNWHX commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTDCX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 73.9B vs. GTDCX (1.26B). RNWHX pays higher dividends than GTDCX: RNWHX (0.97) vs GTDCX (0.18). GTDCX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: GTDCX (27 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). GTDCX (2.14) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. GTDCX (20.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than GTDCX: RNWHX (250) vs GTDCX (1000). RNWHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.81 vs. GTDCX (8.14). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 33.26 vs. GTDCX (4.55).
| GTDCX | RNWHX | GTDCX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.14 | 0.72 | 297% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.14 | 0.72 | 297% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.784 | 22.152 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.26B | 73.9B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.18 | 0.97 | 19% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.14 | 10.81 | 75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.48 | 56.94 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.55 | 33.26 | 14% |
| Returns for 10 years | 71.03 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement