Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GTDCX vs RNWFX
GTDCX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts GTDCX vs RNWFX
Invesco Emerging Markets ex-China C
Price$37.94
Change-$0.37 (-0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.14B
American Funds New World R5
Price$98.78
Change-$0.46 (-0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.46B
GTDCX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GTDCX vs. RNWFX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTDCX is a StrongBuy and RNWFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. GTDCX (1.15B). GTDCX pays higher dividends than RNWFX: GTDCX (2.76) vs RNWFX (1.31). GTDCX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: GTDCX (27 years) vs RNWFX (24 years). GTDCX (2.14) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). GTDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 96.00 vs. RNWFX (46.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GTDCX: RNWFX (250) vs GTDCX (1000). RNWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.90 vs. GTDCX (23.13). RNWFX return over 5 years is better than : 12.39 vs. GTDCX (-9.77).
| GTDCX | RNWFX | GTDCX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.14 | 0.62 | 345% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.14 | 0.62 | 345% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.789 | 6.094 | 193% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.15B | 75.5B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.76 | 1.31 | 211% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.13 | 27.90 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.85 | 43.85 | 45% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.77 | 12.39 | -79% |
| Returns for 10 years | 75.36 | 127.30 | 59% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement