Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GTDCX vs RNWEX
GTDCX vs RNWEX Comparison
Open Charts GTDCX vs RNWEX
Invesco Emerging Markets ex-China C
Price$37.94
Change-$0.37 (-0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.14B
American Funds New World R4
Price$97.70
Change-$0.46 (-0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.46B
GTDCX vs RNWEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GTDCX vs. RNWEX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTDCX is a StrongBuy and RNWEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWEX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. GTDCX (1.15B). GTDCX pays higher dividends than RNWEX: GTDCX (2.76) vs RNWEX (1.06). GTDCX was incepted earlier than RNWEX: GTDCX (27 years) vs RNWEX (23 years). GTDCX (2.14) is less costly to investors than RNWEX (0.92). GTDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 96.00 vs. RNWEX (46.00). RNWEX has a lower initial minimum investment than GTDCX: RNWEX (250) vs GTDCX (1000). RNWEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.46 vs. GTDCX (23.13). RNWEX return over 5 years is better than : 10.91 vs. GTDCX (-9.77).
| GTDCX | RNWEX | GTDCX / RNWEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.14 | 0.92 | 233% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.14 | 0.92 | 233% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.789 | 6.073 | 194% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.15B | 75.5B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.76 | 1.06 | 261% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.13 | 27.46 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.85 | 42.44 | 47% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.77 | 10.91 | -90% |
| Returns for 10 years | 75.36 | 123.66 | 61% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement