Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GTDCX vs RNWEX
GTDCX vs RNWEX Comparison
Open Charts GTDCX vs RNWEX
Invesco Emerging Markets ex-China C
Price$34.07
Change+$0.31 (+0.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.04B
American Funds New World R4
Price$92.73
Change+$0.22 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.3B
GTDCX vs RNWEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GTDCX vs. RNWEX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTDCX is a StrongBuy and RNWEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWEX has more cash in the bank: 75.3B vs. GTDCX (1.04B). RNWEX pays higher dividends than GTDCX: RNWEX (0.72) vs GTDCX (0.16). GTDCX was incepted earlier than RNWEX: GTDCX (27 years) vs RNWEX (23 years). GTDCX (2.14) is less costly to investors than RNWEX (0.92). RNWEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. GTDCX (20.00). RNWEX has a lower initial minimum investment than GTDCX: RNWEX (250) vs GTDCX (1000). RNWEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.53 vs. GTDCX (4.09). RNWEX return over 5 years is better than : 11.09 vs. GTDCX (-16.18).
| GTDCX | RNWEX | GTDCX / RNWEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.14 | 0.92 | 233% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.14 | 0.92 | 233% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.742 | 21.232 | 27% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.04B | 75.3B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.16 | 0.72 | 22% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.09 | 19.53 | 21% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.81 | 43.77 | 27% |
| Returns for 5 years | -16.18 | 11.09 | -146% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.72 | 89.65 | 48% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement