Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GTDCX vs RNWBX
GTDCX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts GTDCX vs RNWBX
Invesco Emerging Markets ex-China C
Price$38.87
Change+$0.17 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.18B
American Funds New World R2
Price$90.79
Change-$0.09 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.73B
GTDCX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GTDCX vs. RNWBX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTDCX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 74.7B vs. GTDCX (1.18B). GTDCX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: GTDCX (0.17) vs RNWBX (0.12). GTDCX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: GTDCX (27 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). GTDCX (2.14) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. GTDCX (20.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GTDCX: RNWBX (250) vs GTDCX (1000). RNWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.08 vs. GTDCX (13.08). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 24.45 vs. GTDCX (2.81).
| GTDCX | RNWBX | GTDCX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.14 | 1.67 | 128% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.14 | 1.67 | 128% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.112 | 23.562 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.18B | 74.7B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.17 | 0.12 | 140% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.08 | 14.08 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.38 | 55.31 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.81 | 24.45 | 11% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.59 | 85.42 | 67% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement