Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GTDCX vs RNWBX
GTDCX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts GTDCX vs RNWBX
Invesco Emerging Markets ex-China C
Price$36.12
Change+$0.22 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.21B
American Funds New World R2
Price$86.97
Change+$0.63 (+0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.38B
GTDCX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GTDCX vs. RNWBX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTDCX is a Buy and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 71.4B vs. GTDCX (1.21B). GTDCX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: GTDCX (0.18) vs RNWBX (0.13). GTDCX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: GTDCX (27 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). GTDCX (2.14) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. GTDCX (20.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GTDCX: RNWBX (250) vs GTDCX (1000). RNWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.06 vs. GTDCX (10.74). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 21.44 vs. GTDCX (-3.59).
| GTDCX | RNWBX | GTDCX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.14 | 1.67 | 128% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.14 | 1.67 | 128% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.104 | 18.246 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.21B | 71.4B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.18 | 0.13 | 143% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.74 | 14.06 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.11 | 40.53 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.59 | 21.44 | -17% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.97 | 84.15 | 67% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers