Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GTDCX vs RNWBX
GTDCX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts GTDCX vs RNWBX
Invesco Emerging Markets ex-China C
Price$34.07
Change+$0.31 (+0.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.04B
American Funds New World R2
Price$88.91
Change+$0.20 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.3B
GTDCX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GTDCX vs. RNWBX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTDCX is a StrongBuy and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75.3B vs. GTDCX (1.04B). GTDCX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: GTDCX (0.16) vs RNWBX (0.12). GTDCX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: GTDCX (27 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). GTDCX (2.14) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. GTDCX (20.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GTDCX: RNWBX (250) vs GTDCX (1000). RNWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.18 vs. GTDCX (4.09). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 7.90 vs. GTDCX (-16.18).
| GTDCX | RNWBX | GTDCX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.14 | 1.67 | 128% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.14 | 1.67 | 128% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.742 | 20.884 | 27% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.04B | 75.3B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.16 | 0.12 | 137% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.09 | 19.18 | 21% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.81 | 41.02 | 29% |
| Returns for 5 years | -16.18 | 7.90 | -205% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.72 | 82.81 | 52% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement