GTBIF
Price
$7.27
Change
-$0.15 (-2.02%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
1.69B
HLTRF
Price
$3.80
Change
-$0.03 (-0.78%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
121.98M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GTBIF vs HLTRF

Header iconGTBIF vs HLTRF Comparison
Open Charts GTBIF vs HLTRFBanner chart's image
Green Thumb Industries
Price$7.27
Change-$0.15 (-2.02%)
Volume$198.04K
Capitalization1.69B
HLS Therapeutics
Price$3.80
Change-$0.03 (-0.78%)
Volume$100
Capitalization121.98M
GTBIF vs HLTRF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GTBIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HLTRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GTBIF vs. HLTRF commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTBIF is a Hold and HLTRF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (GTBIF: $7.27 vs. HLTRF: $3.80)
Brand notoriety: GTBIF and HLTRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Pharmaceuticals: Generic industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GTBIF: 30% vs. HLTRF: 19%
Market capitalization -- GTBIF: $1.68B vs. HLTRF: $121.59M
GTBIF [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] is valued at $1.68B. HLTRF’s [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] market capitalization is $121.59M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] industry ranges from $63.66B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] industry is $3.82B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GTBIF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHLTRF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GTBIF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HLTRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HLTRF is a better buy in the long-term than GTBIF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GTBIF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HLTRF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GTBIF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HLTRF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both GTBIF and HLTRF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

GTBIF (@Pharmaceuticals: Generic) experienced а -11.56% price change this week, while HLTRF (@Pharmaceuticals: Generic) price change was -0.78% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Generic industry was -1.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +24.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +66.99%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pharmaceuticals: Generic (-1.16% weekly)

A generic drug contains the same chemical substance as a drug that was originally protected by patents. Generic drugs are generally sold at cheaper price points, compared to name-brand pharmaceuticals, after patents for the more expensive drugs lapse. The generic drug industry has created a major market, thanks to the lower pricing. According to the Center for Justice and Democracy at New York Law School, 80 percent of all drugs prescribed are generic, and generic drugs are chosen 94 percent of the time when they are available. But their manufacturers must be able to prove to the FDA that they can be effective substitutes for the original drugs. Some of the major generic drug makers include Zoetis, Inc., Allergan plc and Mylan N.V.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GTBIF($1.69B) has a higher market cap than HLTRF($122M). HLTRF YTD gains are higher at: 41.264 vs. GTBIF (-11.016). GTBIF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 338M vs. HLTRF (15.5M). GTBIF has more cash in the bank: 177M vs. HLTRF (12.2M). HLTRF has less debt than GTBIF: HLTRF (55.6M) vs GTBIF (523M). GTBIF has higher revenues than HLTRF: GTBIF (1.15B) vs HLTRF (56.4M).
GTBIFHLTRFGTBIF / HLTRF
Capitalization1.69B122M1,384%
EBITDA338M15.5M2,181%
Gain YTD-11.01641.264-27%
P/E Ratio66.09N/A-
Revenue1.15B56.4M2,046%
Total Cash177M12.2M1,451%
Total Debt523M55.6M941%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GTBIF vs HLTRF: Fundamental Ratings
GTBIF
HLTRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
333
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
85
Overvalued
25
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9196
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5247
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
507

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HLTRF's Valuation (25) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GTBIF (85). This means that HLTRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GTBIF’s over the last 12 months.

HLTRF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as GTBIF (100). This means that HLTRF’s stock grew similarly to GTBIF’s over the last 12 months.

GTBIF's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as HLTRF (96). This means that GTBIF’s stock grew similarly to HLTRF’s over the last 12 months.

HLTRF's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as GTBIF (52). This means that HLTRF’s stock grew similarly to GTBIF’s over the last 12 months.

GTBIF's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HLTRF (100). This means that GTBIF’s stock grew significantly faster than HLTRF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GTBIFHLTRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
38%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
83%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GTBIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HLTRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GSTOX21.090.18
+0.86%
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Gr Insghts Inv
GATCX43.330.36
+0.84%
Gabelli Asset C
NCGFX71.190.44
+0.62%
New Covenant Growth
JBGAX66.190.19
+0.29%
JHancock Blue Chip Growth A
RYPAX54.88N/A
N/A
Rydex Transportation H

GTBIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GTBIF has been closely correlated with CURLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GTBIF jumps, then CURLF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GTBIF
1D Price
Change %
GTBIF100%
-2.02%
CURLF - GTBIF
82%
Closely correlated
-7.35%
TCNNF - GTBIF
82%
Closely correlated
+1.09%
VRNOF - GTBIF
79%
Closely correlated
-1.72%
TSNDF - GTBIF
77%
Closely correlated
-2.69%
CRLBF - GTBIF
71%
Closely correlated
-1.90%
More

HLTRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HLTRF has been loosely correlated with PHCUF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HLTRF jumps, then PHCUF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HLTRF
1D Price
Change %
HLTRF100%
-0.78%
PHCUF - HLTRF
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
INCR - HLTRF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.39%
GTBIF - HLTRF
3%
Poorly correlated
-2.02%
ESALF - HLTRF
3%
Poorly correlated
-2.37%
INDV - HLTRF
2%
Poorly correlated
+4.87%
More