GTBIF
Price
$6.29
Change
+$0.30 (+5.01%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
1.68B
HKMPY
Price
$55.00
Change
+$1.01 (+1.87%)
Updated
Jul 23 closing price
Capitalization
5.93B
Interact to see
Advertisement

GTBIF vs HKMPY

Header iconGTBIF vs HKMPY Comparison
Open Charts GTBIF vs HKMPYBanner chart's image
Green Thumb Industries
Price$6.29
Change+$0.30 (+5.01%)
Volume$1.42M
Capitalization1.68B
Hikma Pharmaceuticals
Price$55.00
Change+$1.01 (+1.87%)
Volume$532
Capitalization5.93B
GTBIF vs HKMPY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GTBIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HKMPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GTBIF vs. HKMPY commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTBIF is a Hold and HKMPY is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (GTBIF: $6.29 vs. HKMPY: $55.00)
Brand notoriety: GTBIF and HKMPY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Pharmaceuticals: Other industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GTBIF: 346% vs. HKMPY: 139%
Market capitalization -- GTBIF: $1.68B vs. HKMPY: $5.93B
GTBIF [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] is valued at $1.68B. HKMPY’s [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] market capitalization is $5.93B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry ranges from $77.48B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry is $3.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GTBIF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHKMPY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GTBIF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HKMPY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HKMPY is a better buy in the long-term than GTBIF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GTBIF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HKMPY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GTBIF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HKMPY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GTBIF is a better buy in the short-term than HKMPY.

Price Growth

GTBIF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а +11.92% price change this week, while HKMPY (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) price change was +2.40% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was +3.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +74.65%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pharmaceuticals: Other (+3.51% weekly)

Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HKMPY($5.93B) has a higher market cap than GTBIF($1.68B). GTBIF has higher P/E ratio than HKMPY: GTBIF (172.41) vs HKMPY (32.15). HKMPY YTD gains are higher at: 11.965 vs. GTBIF (-23.011). HKMPY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 489M vs. GTBIF (253M). HKMPY has more cash in the bank: 292M vs. GTBIF (185M). GTBIF has less debt than HKMPY: GTBIF (541M) vs HKMPY (1.28B). HKMPY has higher revenues than GTBIF: HKMPY (2.52B) vs GTBIF (1.02B).
GTBIFHKMPYGTBIF / HKMPY
Capitalization1.68B5.93B28%
EBITDA253M489M52%
Gain YTD-23.01111.965-192%
P/E Ratio172.4132.15536%
Revenue1.02B2.52B41%
Total Cash185M292M63%
Total Debt541M1.28B42%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GTBIF vs HKMPY: Fundamental Ratings
GTBIF
HKMPY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
74
Overvalued
17
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10089
SMR RATING
1..100
8790
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5654
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9092
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HKMPY's Valuation (17) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GTBIF (74). This means that HKMPY’s stock grew somewhat faster than GTBIF’s over the last 12 months.

HKMPY's Profit vs Risk Rating (89) in the null industry is in the same range as GTBIF (100). This means that HKMPY’s stock grew similarly to GTBIF’s over the last 12 months.

GTBIF's SMR Rating (87) in the null industry is in the same range as HKMPY (90). This means that GTBIF’s stock grew similarly to HKMPY’s over the last 12 months.

HKMPY's Price Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as GTBIF (56). This means that HKMPY’s stock grew similarly to GTBIF’s over the last 12 months.

GTBIF's P/E Growth Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as HKMPY (92). This means that GTBIF’s stock grew similarly to HKMPY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GTBIFHKMPY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
55%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GTBIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HKMPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FHEQ29.310.08
+0.27%
Fidelity Hedged Equity ETF
LEXI33.040.07
+0.23%
Alexis Practical Tactical ETF
IBDR24.220.02
+0.08%
iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Corp ETF
IBII25.78N/A
N/A
iShares iBonds Oct 2032 Term Tips ETF
DXIV59.31-0.07
-0.11%
Dimensional International Vector Eq ETF

GTBIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GTBIF has been closely correlated with CURLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GTBIF jumps, then CURLF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GTBIF
1D Price
Change %
GTBIF100%
+5.01%
CURLF - GTBIF
82%
Closely correlated
+13.23%
TCNNF - GTBIF
82%
Closely correlated
+8.39%
VRNOF - GTBIF
79%
Closely correlated
+13.55%
TSNDF - GTBIF
77%
Closely correlated
+10.56%
CRLBF - GTBIF
71%
Closely correlated
+8.03%
More

HKMPY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HKMPY and HYPMY have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HKMPY and HYPMY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HKMPY
1D Price
Change %
HKMPY100%
N/A
HYPMY - HKMPY
14%
Poorly correlated
-4.52%
JUSHF - HKMPY
5%
Poorly correlated
+9.15%
HLTRF - HKMPY
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.83%
INDV - HKMPY
3%
Poorly correlated
+1.96%
GTBIF - HKMPY
2%
Poorly correlated
+5.01%
More