Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GTAPX vs NLSIX
GTAPX vs NLSIX Comparison
Open Charts GTAPX vs NLSIX
Glenmede Long/Short Eq Ptf
Price$14.60
Change+$0.03 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets38.12M
Neuberger Berman Long Short Instl
Price$20.17
Change-$0.01 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.99B
GTAPX vs NLSIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GTAPX vs. NLSIX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTAPX is a Buy and NLSIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSIX has more cash in the bank: 8B vs. GTAPX (38.1M). GTAPX pays higher dividends than NLSIX: GTAPX (1.20) vs NLSIX (0.02). GTAPX was incepted earlier than NLSIX: GTAPX (19 years) vs NLSIX (14 years). GTAPX (2.99) is less costly to investors than NLSIX (1.32). NLSIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. GTAPX (0.99). GTAPX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLSIX: GTAPX (0) vs NLSIX (1000000). NLSIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.36 vs. GTAPX (0.68). GTAPX return over 5 years is better than : 35.93 vs. NLSIX (22.90).
| GTAPX | NLSIX | GTAPX / NLSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.52 | 1.32 | 191% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.99 | 1.32 | 227% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.690 | 7.733 | 138% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 38.1M | 8B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 0.02 | 5,907% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.68 | 7.36 | 9% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.05 | 21.30 | 42% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.93 | 22.90 | 157% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.57 | 62.95 | 60% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement