Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GTAPX vs NLSIX
GTAPX vs NLSIX Comparison
Open Charts GTAPX vs NLSIX
Glenmede Long/Short Eq Ptf
Price$13.82
Change+$0.02 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.93M
Neuberger Berman Long Short Instl
Price$19.55
Change+$0.08 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.45B
GTAPX vs NLSIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GTAPX vs. NLSIX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTAPX is a Buy and NLSIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSIX has more cash in the bank: 7.45B vs. GTAPX (44.9M). GTAPX pays higher dividends than NLSIX: GTAPX (1.76) vs NLSIX (0.02). GTAPX was incepted earlier than NLSIX: GTAPX (19 years) vs NLSIX (14 years). GTAPX (2.99) is less costly to investors than NLSIX (1.32). NLSIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. GTAPX (0.99). GTAPX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLSIX: GTAPX (0) vs NLSIX (1000000). NLSIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.51 vs. GTAPX (0.97). GTAPX return over 5 years is better than : 33.67 vs. NLSIX (29.98).
| GTAPX | NLSIX | GTAPX / NLSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.52 | 1.32 | 191% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.99 | 1.32 | 227% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.559 | 4.267 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 44.9M | 7.45B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.76 | 0.02 | 8,386% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.97 | 8.51 | 11% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.42 | 19.44 | 43% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.67 | 29.98 | 112% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.65 | 52.51 | 60% |