Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GTAPX vs NLSCX
GTAPX vs NLSCX Comparison
Open Charts GTAPX vs NLSCX
Glenmede Long/Short Eq Ptf
Price$14.60
Change+$0.03 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets38.12M
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.83
Change-$0.02 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.99B
GTAPX vs NLSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GTAPX vs. NLSCX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTAPX is a Buy and NLSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 8B vs. GTAPX (38.1M). GTAPX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: GTAPX (1.20) vs NLSCX (0.00). GTAPX was incepted earlier than NLSCX: GTAPX (19 years) vs NLSCX (14 years). GTAPX (2.99) is less costly to investors than NLSCX (2.43). NLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. GTAPX (0.99). GTAPX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLSCX: GTAPX (0) vs NLSCX (1000). NLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.13 vs. GTAPX (0.68). GTAPX return over 5 years is better than : 35.93 vs. NLSCX (15.78).
| GTAPX | NLSCX | GTAPX / NLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.52 | 2.43 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.99 | 2.43 | 123% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.690 | 6.614 | 162% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 38.1M | 8B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.68 | 6.13 | 11% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.05 | 17.00 | 53% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.93 | 15.78 | 228% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.57 | 45.22 | 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement