Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GTAPX vs NLSCX
GTAPX vs NLSCX Comparison
Open Charts GTAPX vs NLSCX
Glenmede Long/Short Eq Ptf
Price$13.15
Change-$1.08 (-7.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.46M
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.62
Change-$0.09 (-0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.16B
GTAPX vs NLSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GTAPX vs. NLSCX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTAPX is a Buy and NLSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 8.16B vs. GTAPX (39.5M). GTAPX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: GTAPX (1.43) vs NLSCX (0.00). GTAPX was incepted earlier than NLSCX: GTAPX (19 years) vs NLSCX (14 years). GTAPX (2.99) is less costly to investors than NLSCX (2.43). GTAPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 109.00 vs. NLSCX (0.96). GTAPX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLSCX: GTAPX (0) vs NLSCX (1000). NLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.65 vs. GTAPX (-2.95). GTAPX return over 5 years is better than : 17.87 vs. NLSCX (14.66).
| GTAPX | NLSCX | GTAPX / NLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.52 | 2.43 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.99 | 2.43 | 123% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.017 | -0.693 | -291% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 39.5M | 8.16B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.43 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.95 | 2.65 | -111% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.40 | 22.54 | -2% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.87 | 14.66 | 122% |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.72 | 52.68 | 53% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement