Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GTAPX vs NLSCX
GTAPX vs NLSCX Comparison
Open Charts GTAPX vs NLSCX
Glenmede Long/Short Eq Ptf
Price$14.71
Change-$0.04 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.06M
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.84
Change-$0.08 (-0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.07B
GTAPX vs NLSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GTAPX vs. NLSCX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTAPX is a Buy and NLSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 8.07B vs. GTAPX (39.1M). GTAPX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: GTAPX (1.21) vs NLSCX (0.00). GTAPX was incepted earlier than NLSCX: GTAPX (19 years) vs NLSCX (14 years). GTAPX (2.99) is less costly to investors than NLSCX (2.43). NLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. GTAPX (0.99). GTAPX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLSCX: GTAPX (0) vs NLSCX (1000). NLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.07 vs. GTAPX (2.07). GTAPX return over 5 years is better than : 38.48 vs. NLSCX (16.58).
| GTAPX | NLSCX | GTAPX / NLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.52 | 2.43 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.99 | 2.43 | 123% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.981 | 6.953 | 172% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 39.1M | 8.07B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.21 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.07 | 7.07 | 29% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.78 | 19.29 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.48 | 16.58 | 232% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.15 | 47.75 | 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement