Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GTAPX vs NLSAX
GTAPX vs NLSAX Comparison
Open Charts GTAPX vs NLSAX
Glenmede Long/Short Eq Ptf
Price$14.71
Change-$0.04 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.06M
Neuberger Berman Long Short A
Price$19.80
Change-$0.08 (-0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.07B
GTAPX vs NLSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GTAPX vs. NLSAX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTAPX is a Hold and NLSAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSAX has more cash in the bank: 8.07B vs. GTAPX (39.1M). GTAPX pays higher dividends than NLSAX: GTAPX (1.21) vs NLSAX (0.00). GTAPX was incepted earlier than NLSAX: GTAPX (19 years) vs NLSAX (14 years). GTAPX (2.99) is less costly to investors than NLSAX (1.68). NLSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. GTAPX (0.99). GTAPX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLSAX: GTAPX (0) vs NLSAX (1000). NLSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.38 vs. GTAPX (2.21). GTAPX return over 5 years is better than : 38.11 vs. NLSAX (20.86).
| GTAPX | NLSAX | GTAPX / NLSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.52 | 1.68 | 150% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.99 | 1.68 | 178% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.677 | 7.259 | 161% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 39.1M | 8.07B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.21 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.21 | 7.38 | 30% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.83 | 21.97 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.11 | 20.86 | 183% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.14 | 58.44 | 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement