GT
Price
$7.59
Change
-$0.14 (-1.81%)
Updated
Nov 13, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.21B
84 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
LIMAF
Price
$53.37
Change
+$0.35 (+0.66%)
Updated
Nov 11 closing price
Capitalization
3.22B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GT vs LIMAF

Header iconGT vs LIMAF Comparison
Open Charts GT vs LIMAFBanner chart's image
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (The)
Price$7.59
Change-$0.14 (-1.81%)
Volume$74.77K
Capitalization2.21B
Linamar
Price$53.37
Change+$0.35 (+0.66%)
Volume$4.24K
Capitalization3.22B
GT vs LIMAF Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GT vs. LIMAF commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GT is a Hold and LIMAF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (GT: $7.73 vs. LIMAF: $53.37)
Brand notoriety: GT: Notable vs. LIMAF: Not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GT: 72% vs. LIMAF: 197%
Market capitalization -- GT: $2.21B vs. LIMAF: $3.22B
GT [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $2.21B. LIMAF’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $3.22B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $82.8B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $6.52B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLIMAF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • GT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LIMAF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, LIMAF is a better buy in the long-term than GT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LIMAF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • LIMAF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GT is a better buy in the short-term than LIMAF.

Price Growth

GT (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а -3.86% price change this week, while LIMAF (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was -0.24% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -1.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.65%.

Reported Earning Dates

GT is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (-1.16% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LIMAF($3.22B) has a higher market cap than GT($2.21B). LIMAF has higher P/E ratio than GT: LIMAF (21.21) vs GT (4.69). LIMAF YTD gains are higher at: 35.114 vs. GT (-14.111). GT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.06B vs. LIMAF (1.16B). LIMAF has more cash in the bank: 1B vs. GT (785M). LIMAF has less debt than GT: LIMAF (2.21B) vs GT (8.98B). GT has higher revenues than LIMAF: GT (18.5B) vs LIMAF (10.2B).
GTLIMAFGT / LIMAF
Capitalization2.21B3.22B69%
EBITDA2.06B1.16B177%
Gain YTD-14.11135.114-40%
P/E Ratio4.6921.2122%
Revenue18.5B10.2B181%
Total Cash785M1B78%
Total Debt8.98B2.21B406%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GT vs LIMAF: Fundamental Ratings
GT
LIMAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1886
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
58
Fair valued
32
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10066
SMR RATING
1..100
7586
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6348
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1004
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LIMAF's Valuation (32) in the null industry is in the same range as GT (58) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry. This means that LIMAF’s stock grew similarly to GT’s over the last 12 months.

LIMAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (66) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GT (100) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry. This means that LIMAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GT’s over the last 12 months.

GT's SMR Rating (75) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry is in the same range as LIMAF (86) in the null industry. This means that GT’s stock grew similarly to LIMAF’s over the last 12 months.

LIMAF's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as GT (63) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry. This means that LIMAF’s stock grew similarly to GT’s over the last 12 months.

LIMAF's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GT (100) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry. This means that LIMAF’s stock grew significantly faster than GT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GTLIMAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
LIMAF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DRIPX30.850.08
+0.26%
The MP 63
PIBAX19.580.05
+0.26%
PGIM Balanced A
PMBPX44.730.07
+0.16%
Principal MidCap R5
SGTRX92.890.01
+0.01%
Columbia Seligman Global Tech R
MLNSX27.75N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Instl Glbl Concntr R6

GT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GT has been loosely correlated with LIMAF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GT jumps, then LIMAF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GT
1D Price
Change %
GT100%
+3.07%
LIMAF - GT
48%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MNRO - GT
44%
Loosely correlated
+2.14%
LEA - GT
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.13%
BWA - GT
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.52%
VC - GT
40%
Loosely correlated
-1.11%
More

LIMAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIMAF has been loosely correlated with MGA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LIMAF jumps, then MGA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LIMAF
1D Price
Change %
LIMAF100%
N/A
MGA - LIMAF
56%
Loosely correlated
+1.12%
LEA - LIMAF
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.13%
AXL - LIMAF
48%
Loosely correlated
+3.18%
GT - LIMAF
48%
Loosely correlated
+3.07%
DAN - LIMAF
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.05%
More