GT
Price
$8.59
Change
+$0.09 (+1.06%)
Updated
Sep 8 closing price
Capitalization
2.46B
50 days until earnings call
LEA
Price
$111.17
Change
-$1.58 (-1.40%)
Updated
Sep 9, 11:41 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
6B
56 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

GT vs LEA

Header iconGT vs LEA Comparison
Open Charts GT vs LEABanner chart's image
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (The)
Price$8.59
Change+$0.09 (+1.06%)
Volume$6.9M
Capitalization2.46B
Lear
Price$111.17
Change-$1.58 (-1.40%)
Volume$300
Capitalization6B
GT vs LEA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LEA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GT vs. LEA commentary
Sep 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GT is a Buy and LEA is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 09, 2025
Stock price -- (GT: $8.59 vs. LEA: $112.75)
Brand notoriety: GT: Notable vs. LEA: Not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GT: 90% vs. LEA: 99%
Market capitalization -- GT: $2.46B vs. LEA: $6B
GT [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $2.46B. LEA’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $6B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $90.28B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $6.66B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLEA’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • GT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LEA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, LEA is a better buy in the long-term than GT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LEA’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • LEA’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LEA is a better buy in the short-term than GT.

Price Growth

GT (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а +1.30% price change this week, while LEA (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was +3.22% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +1.55%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.46%.

Reported Earning Dates

GT is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

LEA is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (+1.55% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LEA($6B) has a higher market cap than GT($2.46B). LEA has higher P/E ratio than GT: LEA (15.95) vs GT (5.84). LEA YTD gains are higher at: 21.953 vs. GT (-4.556). GT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.06B vs. LEA (1.26B). LEA has more cash in the bank: 888M vs. GT (785M). LEA has less debt than GT: LEA (2.79B) vs GT (8.98B). GT has higher revenues than LEA: GT (18.5B) vs LEA (17.3B).
GTLEAGT / LEA
Capitalization2.46B6B41%
EBITDA2.06B1.26B163%
Gain YTD-4.55621.953-21%
P/E Ratio5.8415.9537%
Revenue18.5B17.3B107%
Total Cash785M888M88%
Total Debt8.98B2.79B322%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GT vs LEA: Fundamental Ratings
GT
LEA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
322
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
56
Fair valued
22
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10094
SMR RATING
1..100
7677
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6444
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10021
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LEA's Valuation (22) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GT (56) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry. This means that LEA’s stock grew somewhat faster than GT’s over the last 12 months.

LEA's Profit vs Risk Rating (94) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as GT (100) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry. This means that LEA’s stock grew similarly to GT’s over the last 12 months.

GT's SMR Rating (76) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry is in the same range as LEA (77) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that GT’s stock grew similarly to LEA’s over the last 12 months.

LEA's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as GT (64) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry. This means that LEA’s stock grew similarly to GT’s over the last 12 months.

LEA's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is significantly better than the same rating for GT (100) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry. This means that LEA’s stock grew significantly faster than GT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GTLEA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 30 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LEA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SFDYX32.470.02
+0.06%
SEI Mid-Cap Y (SIMT)
JGRTX139.64N/A
N/A
Janus Henderson Enterprise S
BRSSX15.37N/A
N/A
MFS Blended Research Small Cap Eq R2
NDVTX18.17-0.02
-0.11%
MFS New Discovery Value R3
GSSUX44.02-0.11
-0.25%
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value R6

GT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GT has been loosely correlated with VC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GT jumps, then VC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GT
1D Price
Change %
GT100%
+1.06%
VC - GT
45%
Loosely correlated
+2.90%
ALV - GT
43%
Loosely correlated
+1.73%
LEA - GT
43%
Loosely correlated
+1.53%
BWA - GT
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.91%
ADNT - GT
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.20%
More

LEA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LEA has been closely correlated with ADNT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LEA jumps, then ADNT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LEA
1D Price
Change %
LEA100%
+1.53%
ADNT - LEA
79%
Closely correlated
-0.20%
VC - LEA
78%
Closely correlated
+2.90%
MGA - LEA
78%
Closely correlated
+0.39%
BWA - LEA
77%
Closely correlated
+0.91%
ALV - LEA
71%
Closely correlated
+1.73%
More