Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSVCX vs RMFCX
GSVCX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts GSVCX vs RMFCX
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Value C
Price$15.62
Change+$0.16 (+1.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets430.75M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$62.01
Change+$0.50 (+0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.18B
GSVCX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSVCX vs. RMFCX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSVCX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. GSVCX (431M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than GSVCX: RMFCX (1.20) vs GSVCX (0.30). GSVCX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: GSVCX (26 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). GSVCX (2.00) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). GSVCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSVCX: RMFCX (250) vs GSVCX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.96 vs. GSVCX (-8.09). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 57.10 vs. GSVCX (17.34).
| GSVCX | RMFCX | GSVCX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 0.91 | 192% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.91 | 220% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.181 | 13.689 | 45% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 431M | 111B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.30 | 1.20 | 25% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.09 | 4.96 | -163% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.17 | 38.79 | 39% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.34 | 57.10 | 30% |
| Returns for 10 years | -1.93 | 91.18 | -2% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers