Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSVCX vs RMEBX
GSVCX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts GSVCX vs RMEBX
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Value C
Price$15.62
Change+$0.16 (+1.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets430.75M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$62.36
Change+$0.51 (+0.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.18B
GSVCX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSVCX vs. RMEBX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSVCX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. GSVCX (431M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than GSVCX: RMEBX (1.05) vs GSVCX (0.30). GSVCX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: GSVCX (26 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). GSVCX (2.00) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). GSVCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSVCX: RMEBX (250) vs GSVCX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.81 vs. GSVCX (-8.09). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 55.95 vs. GSVCX (17.34).
| GSVCX | RMEBX | GSVCX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 1.07 | 164% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 1.07 | 187% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.181 | 13.527 | 46% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 431M | 111B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.30 | 1.05 | 29% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.09 | 4.81 | -168% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.17 | 38.19 | 40% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.34 | 55.95 | 31% |
| Returns for 10 years | -1.93 | 89.36 | -2% |