Advertisement
GSUS vs SNPS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSUS is a StrongBuy and SNPS is a StrongBuy.
SNPS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 92 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 27 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 38 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 22 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| GSUS | SNPS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 79% | 5 days ago 48% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 68% | 5 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 81% | 5 days ago 64% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 71% | 5 days ago 54% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 74% | 5 days ago 57% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 84% | 5 days ago 52% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 84% | 6 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 73% | 8 days ago 55% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 5 days ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 82% | 5 days ago 77% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| PDBA | 36.99 | 0.32 | +0.87% |
| Invesco Agriculture Cmdty Str No K-1ETF | |||
| DRLL | 29.05 | 0.07 | +0.24% |
| Strive U.S. Energy ETF | |||
| XDOC | 33.24 | N/A | N/A |
| Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF Oct | |||
| PTA | 20.18 | -0.04 | -0.20% |
| Cohen & Steers Tax-Advantaged Preferred Securities and Income Fund | |||
| QMNV | 21.90 | -0.09 | -0.43% |
| FT Vest Nasdaq-100® Mod Buffr ETF – Nov | |||
GSUS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GSUS has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GSUS jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GSUS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSUS | 100% | -0.74% | ||
| CDNS - GSUS | 68% Closely correlated | -1.09% | ||
| INTU - GSUS | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.18% | ||
| BLK - GSUS | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.30% | ||
| TER - GSUS | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.30% | ||
| SNPS - GSUS | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.41% | ||
More | ||||
SNPS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SNPS has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SNPS jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SNPS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNPS | 100% | -1.41% | ||
| CDNS - SNPS | 87% Closely correlated | -1.09% | ||
| PDFS - SNPS | 66% Closely correlated | +2.45% | ||
| QTWO - SNPS | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.13% | ||
| ROP - SNPS | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.05% | ||
| CRM - SNPS | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.68% | ||
More | ||||