Advertisement
GSUS vs SNPS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSUS is a Hold and SNPS is a Hold.
SNPS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 10 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 86 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 43 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 38 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 24 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| GSUS | SNPS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 62% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 52% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 72% | 10 days ago 56% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 52% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| NAD | 11.74 | 0.10 | +0.86% |
| Nuveen Quality Municipal Income Fund | |||
| GLU | 18.03 | 0.08 | +0.45% |
| Gabelli Utility & Income Trust (The) | |||
| ZAPR | 25.45 | N/A | N/A |
| Innovator Equity Dfnd Prt ETF -1 Yr Apr | |||
| TBX | 28.05 | -0.07 | -0.25% |
| ProShares Short 7-10 Year Treasury | |||
| DFVX | 72.72 | -0.22 | -0.31% |
| Dimensional US Large Cap Vector ETF | |||
GSUS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GSUS has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GSUS jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GSUS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSUS | 100% | -0.57% | ||
| CDNS - GSUS | 68% Closely correlated | -1.89% | ||
| INTU - GSUS | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.41% | ||
| BLK - GSUS | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.39% | ||
| TER - GSUS | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.37% | ||
| SNPS - GSUS | 64% Loosely correlated | -4.75% | ||
More | ||||
SNPS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SNPS has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SNPS jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SNPS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNPS | 100% | -4.75% | ||
| CDNS - SNPS | 87% Closely correlated | -1.89% | ||
| PDFS - SNPS | 66% Closely correlated | +15.17% | ||
| QTWO - SNPS | 56% Loosely correlated | -2.60% | ||
| ROP - SNPS | 56% Loosely correlated | -1.11% | ||
| CRM - SNPS | 56% Loosely correlated | -2.05% | ||
More | ||||