Advertisement
GSUS vs SNPS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSUS is a Hold and SNPS is a Hold.
SNPS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 77 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 85 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 47 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 57 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 33 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 90 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| GSUS | SNPS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 69% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 62% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 59% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 84% | 22 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 56% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 60% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| EMSF | 29.76 | 0.72 | +2.49% |
| Matthews Emerging Markets Sus Fut ActETF | |||
| NNY | 8.46 | 0.03 | +0.36% |
| Nuveen New York Municipal Value Fund | |||
| BUFZ | 25.78 | -0.07 | -0.27% |
| FT Vest Laddered Moderate Bffr ETF | |||
| XLG | 57.22 | -0.28 | -0.49% |
| Invesco S&P 500® Top 50 ETF | |||
| DXUV | 57.53 | -0.59 | -1.02% |
| Dimensional US Vector Equity ETF | |||
GSUS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GSUS has been closely correlated with SNPS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GSUS jumps, then SNPS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GSUS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSUS | 100% | -0.66% | ||
| SNPS - GSUS | 71% Closely correlated | +0.99% | ||
| CDNS - GSUS | 71% Closely correlated | +0.05% | ||
| LRCX - GSUS | 69% Closely correlated | -1.66% | ||
| KLAC - GSUS | 68% Closely correlated | +1.08% | ||
| MSFT - GSUS | 67% Closely correlated | -0.35% | ||
More | ||||
SNPS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SNPS has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SNPS jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SNPS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNPS | 100% | +0.99% | ||
| CDNS - SNPS | 88% Closely correlated | +0.05% | ||
| S - SNPS | 67% Closely correlated | -0.18% | ||
| PDFS - SNPS | 66% Closely correlated | +0.47% | ||
| ROP - SNPS | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.07% | ||
| BSY - SNPS | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.83% | ||
More | ||||