Advertisement
GSUS vs SNPS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSUS is a Buy and SNPS is a Hold.
SNPS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 28 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 87 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 46 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 65 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 28 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| GSUS | SNPS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 53% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 66% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 64% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 69% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 71% | 29 days ago 57% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 60% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| TXUG | 24.57 | 0.14 | +0.56% |
| Thornburg International Growth ETF | |||
| BFEB | 48.54 | 0.04 | +0.08% |
| Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF™ - Feb | |||
| PULS | 49.70 | 0.03 | +0.06% |
| PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF | |||
| AAPB | 35.05 | -0.23 | -0.65% |
| GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF | |||
| PDT | 12.55 | -0.19 | -1.49% |
| John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund | |||
GSUS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GSUS has been closely correlated with SNPS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GSUS jumps, then SNPS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GSUS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSUS | 100% | +0.22% | ||
| SNPS - GSUS | 71% Closely correlated | +0.30% | ||
| CDNS - GSUS | 71% Closely correlated | -0.78% | ||
| LRCX - GSUS | 69% Closely correlated | +0.27% | ||
| KLAC - GSUS | 68% Closely correlated | +0.59% | ||
| MSFT - GSUS | 67% Closely correlated | +1.03% | ||
More | ||||
SNPS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SNPS has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SNPS jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SNPS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNPS | 100% | +0.30% | ||
| CDNS - SNPS | 88% Closely correlated | -0.78% | ||
| PDFS - SNPS | 66% Closely correlated | +0.19% | ||
| ROP - SNPS | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.80% | ||
| BSY - SNPS | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.49% | ||
| CLSK - SNPS | 55% Loosely correlated | +2.00% | ||
More | ||||