Advertisement
GSUS vs SNPS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSUS is a Buy and SNPS is a Hold.
SNPS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 89 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 25 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 39 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 7 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 36 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 2 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| GSUS | SNPS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 68% | 4 days ago 52% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 74% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 65% | 4 days ago 72% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 71% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 84% | 5 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 73% | 8 days ago 55% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% | 4 days ago 65% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 69% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| HISF | 44.46 | 0.08 | +0.19% |
| First Trust High Income Strat Foc ETF | |||
| AGG | 98.11 | 0.18 | +0.18% |
| iShares Core US Aggregate Bond ETF | |||
| UYG | 95.52 | N/A | N/A |
| ProShares Ultra Financials | |||
| FCPI | 46.74 | -0.09 | -0.20% |
| Fidelity Stocks for Inflation ETF | |||
| DESK | 39.54 | -0.23 | -0.59% |
| VanEck Office and Commercial REIT ETF | |||
GSUS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GSUS has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GSUS jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GSUS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSUS | 100% | -0.01% | ||
| CDNS - GSUS | 68% Closely correlated | -1.65% | ||
| INTU - GSUS | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.36% | ||
| BLK - GSUS | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.16% | ||
| TER - GSUS | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.21% | ||
| SNPS - GSUS | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.72% | ||
More | ||||
SNPS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SNPS has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SNPS jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SNPS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNPS | 100% | -0.72% | ||
| CDNS - SNPS | 87% Closely correlated | -1.65% | ||
| S - SNPS | 68% Closely correlated | +1.64% | ||
| PDFS - SNPS | 66% Closely correlated | +0.26% | ||
| MSFT - SNPS | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.32% | ||
| DDOG - SNPS | 57% Loosely correlated | +1.31% | ||
More | ||||