Advertisement
GSUS vs LRCX
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSUS is a Hold and LRCX is a StrongBuy.
LRCX | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 79 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 58 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 14 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 18 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 2 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 13 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 47 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| GSUS | LRCX | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 67% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 61% | 3 days ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | 3 days ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 62% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 19 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 8 days ago 66% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 60% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 76% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| SFLR | 36.91 | 0.02 | +0.05% |
| Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF | |||
| QCOC | 22.30 | 0.01 | +0.04% |
| FT Vest Nasdaq-100® Cnsrv Buffr ETF -Oct | |||
| SZOXF | 7.01 | N/A | N/A |
| Deutsche Bank AG (London Branch) | |||
| FIGB | 43.72 | -0.03 | -0.07% |
| Fidelity Investment Grade Bd ETF | |||
| FLMX | 33.32 | -0.60 | -1.76% |
| Franklin FTSE Mexico ETF | |||
GSUS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GSUS has been closely correlated with SNPS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GSUS jumps, then SNPS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GSUS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSUS | 100% | +0.06% | ||
| SNPS - GSUS | 71% Closely correlated | +0.81% | ||
| CDNS - GSUS | 71% Closely correlated | -0.93% | ||
| LRCX - GSUS | 69% Closely correlated | +1.41% | ||
| KLAC - GSUS | 68% Closely correlated | +0.68% | ||
| MSFT - GSUS | 67% Closely correlated | +0.48% | ||
More | ||||
LRCX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LRCX has been closely correlated with AMAT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LRCX jumps, then AMAT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LRCX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LRCX | 100% | +1.41% | ||
| AMAT - LRCX | 92% Closely correlated | +0.90% | ||
| KLAC - LRCX | 90% Closely correlated | +0.68% | ||
| RMBS - LRCX | 80% Closely correlated | -2.59% | ||
| ASML - LRCX | 80% Closely correlated | +1.46% | ||
| ADI - LRCX | 79% Closely correlated | +3.44% | ||
More | ||||