Advertisement
GSUS vs LRCX
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSUS is a Hold and LRCX is a Hold.
LRCX | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 76 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 74 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 9 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 17 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 2 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 10 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| GSUS | LRCX | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 52% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 66% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 77% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| LTTI | 19.24 | 0.09 | +0.49% |
| FT Vest 20+ Year Treasury & Target Income ETF | |||
| ELFY | 37.03 | 0.14 | +0.39% |
| ALPS Electrification Infrastructure ETF | |||
| CLOI | 52.82 | 0.01 | +0.02% |
| VanEck CLO ETF | |||
| ITDE | 37.02 | -0.01 | -0.03% |
| iShares LifePath Target Date 2045 ETF | |||
| JSML | 77.12 | -0.21 | -0.27% |
| Janus Henderson Small Cap Gr Alpha ETF | |||
GSUS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GSUS has been closely correlated with SNPS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GSUS jumps, then SNPS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GSUS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSUS | 100% | -0.58% | ||
| SNPS - GSUS | 71% Closely correlated | -1.26% | ||
| CDNS - GSUS | 71% Closely correlated | -3.06% | ||
| LRCX - GSUS | 69% Closely correlated | -2.61% | ||
| KLAC - GSUS | 68% Closely correlated | -0.51% | ||
| MSFT - GSUS | 67% Closely correlated | -2.40% | ||
More | ||||
LRCX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LRCX has been closely correlated with KLAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LRCX jumps, then KLAC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LRCX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LRCX | 100% | -2.61% | ||
| KLAC - LRCX | 91% Closely correlated | -0.51% | ||
| AMAT - LRCX | 86% Closely correlated | -0.98% | ||
| ASML - LRCX | 81% Closely correlated | -0.51% | ||
| RMBS - LRCX | 80% Closely correlated | +5.38% | ||
| NVMI - LRCX | 80% Closely correlated | +2.07% | ||
More | ||||