Advertisement
GSUS vs KLAC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSUS is a Hold and KLAC is a Hold.
KLAC | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 72 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 70 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 10 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 55 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 36 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| GSUS | KLAC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 59% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 68% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 73% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 71% | 8 days ago 62% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 74% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| XMPT | 21.93 | -0.13 | -0.59% |
| VanEck CEF Municipal Income ETF | |||
| DLY | 14.67 | -0.10 | -0.68% |
| DoubleLine Yield Opportunities Fund | |||
| FRNW | 21.51 | -0.16 | -0.74% |
| Fidelity Clean Energy ETF | |||
| SDY | 138.31 | -1.26 | -0.90% |
| SPDR® S&P Dividend ETF | |||
| WAR | 25.25 | -0.32 | -1.26% |
| U.S. Global Technology and Aerospace and Defense ETF | |||
GSUS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GSUS has been closely correlated with SNPS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GSUS jumps, then SNPS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GSUS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSUS | 100% | -0.66% | ||
| SNPS - GSUS | 71% Closely correlated | +0.99% | ||
| CDNS - GSUS | 71% Closely correlated | +0.05% | ||
| LRCX - GSUS | 69% Closely correlated | -1.66% | ||
| KLAC - GSUS | 68% Closely correlated | +1.08% | ||
| MSFT - GSUS | 67% Closely correlated | -0.35% | ||
More | ||||
KLAC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KLAC has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KLAC jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KLAC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KLAC | 100% | +1.08% | ||
| LRCX - KLAC | 91% Closely correlated | -1.66% | ||
| AMAT - KLAC | 90% Closely correlated | +0.06% | ||
| ASML - KLAC | 83% Closely correlated | +0.97% | ||
| ADI - KLAC | 79% Closely correlated | +1.45% | ||
| QCOM - KLAC | 77% Closely correlated | +0.68% | ||
More | ||||