Ad is loading...
GSSC vs SMMD
GSSC vs SMMD Comparison
Open Charts GSSC vs SMMD
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta® US SmCp Eq ETF
Price$59.04
Change+$0.36 (+0.61%)
Volume$164.5K
Net Assets485.15M
iShares Russell 2500 ETF
Price$58.73
Change+$0.44 (+0.75%)
Volume$740.49K
Net Assets1.21B
GSSC vs SMMD Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSSC vs. SMMD commentary
Apr 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSSC is a Hold and SMMD is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMMD has more net assets: 1.21B vs. GSSC (485M). SMMD has a higher annual dividend yield than GSSC: SMMD (-13.373) vs GSSC (-14.368). GSSC was incepted earlier than SMMD: GSSC (8 years) vs SMMD (8 years). SMMD (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than GSSC (0.20). GSSC has a higher turnover SMMD (9.00) vs SMMD (9.00).
| GSSC | SMMD | GSSC / SMMD | |
| Gain YTD | -14.368 | -13.373 | 107% |
| Net Assets | 485M | 1.21B | 40% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.20 | 0.15 | 133% |
| Turnover | 24.00 | 9.00 | 267% |
| Yield | 1.51 | 1.42 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 8 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| GSSC | SMMD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 86% | 5 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 12 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
GSSC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GSSC has been closely correlated with UFPI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GSSC jumps, then UFPI could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GSSC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSSC | 100% | +0.61% | ||
| UFPI - GSSC | 82% Closely correlated | -0.72% | ||
| BCC - GSSC | 71% Closely correlated | +0.84% | ||
| GMS - GSSC | 67% Closely correlated | +0.83% | ||
| ATKR - GSSC | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.32% | ||
| SSD - GSSC | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.74% | ||
More | ||||
SMMD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMMD has been loosely correlated with PHM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SMMD jumps, then PHM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMMD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMMD | 100% | +0.75% | ||
| PHM - SMMD | 61% Loosely correlated | +2.25% | ||
| BLDR - SMMD | 61% Loosely correlated | +3.43% | ||
| PTC - SMMD | 53% Loosely correlated | -0.29% | ||
| ENTG - SMMD | 53% Loosely correlated | +1.67% | ||
| HUBB - SMMD | 37% Loosely correlated | +0.06% | ||
More | ||||