Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSSC vs IWM
GSSC vs IWM Comparison
Open Charts GSSC vs IWM
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta® US SmCp Eq ETF
Price$79.39
Change+$0.32 (+0.40%)
Volume$100
Net Assets763.13M
iShares Russell 2000 ETF
Price$263.20
Change+$1.85 (+0.71%)
Volume$157.55K
Net Assets76.69B
GSSC vs IWM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSSC vs. IWM commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSSC is a Hold and IWM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWM has more net assets: 76.7B vs. GSSC (763M). IWM has a higher annual dividend yield than GSSC: IWM (6.171) vs GSSC (4.542). GSSC was incepted earlier than IWM: GSSC (9 years) vs IWM (26 years). IWM (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than GSSC (0.20). GSSC has a higher turnover IWM (18.00) vs IWM (18.00).
| GSSC | IWM | GSSC / IWM | |
| Gain YTD | 4.542 | 6.171 | 74% |
| Net Assets | 763M | 76.7B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.20 | 0.19 | 105% |
| Turnover | 30.00 | 18.00 | 167% |
| Yield | 1.18 | 1.04 | 113% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 26 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| GSSC | IWM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 82% | 15 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
GSSC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GSSC has been closely correlated with UFPI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GSSC jumps, then UFPI could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GSSC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSSC | 100% | -0.28% | ||
| UFPI - GSSC | 82% Closely correlated | +0.69% | ||
| BCC - GSSC | 71% Closely correlated | +1.10% | ||
| ATKR - GSSC | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.23% | ||
| SSD - GSSC | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.23% | ||
| FIX - GSSC | 48% Loosely correlated | +3.37% | ||
More | ||||
IWM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWM has been closely correlated with APG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWM jumps, then APG could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWM | 100% | -0.06% | ||
| APG - IWM | 68% Closely correlated | +0.59% | ||
| SSD - IWM | 64% Loosely correlated | +1.23% | ||
| CVNA - IWM | 50% Loosely correlated | +0.87% | ||
| FIX - IWM | 46% Loosely correlated | +3.37% | ||
| ONTO - IWM | 41% Loosely correlated | +3.36% | ||
More | ||||