GSRFF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.01 (-33.33%)
Updated
Dec 13 closing price
ZPHYF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
Ad is loading...

GSRFF vs ZPHYF

Header iconGSRFF vs ZPHYF Comparison
Open Charts GSRFF vs ZPHYFBanner chart's image
GOLDEN SHIELD RES
Price$0.02
Change-$0.01 (-33.33%)
Volume$20.3K
CapitalizationN/A
Zephyr Minerals
Price$0.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$50K
CapitalizationN/A
GSRFF vs ZPHYF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GSRFF vs. ZPHYF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSRFF is a Hold and ZPHYF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (GSRFF: $0.02 vs. ZPHYF: $0.02)
Brand notoriety: GSRFF and ZPHYF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GSRFF: 21% vs. ZPHYF: 195%
Market capitalization -- GSRFF: $10.21M vs. ZPHYF: $5.36M
GSRFF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $10.21M. ZPHYF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $5.36M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GSRFF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileZPHYF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GSRFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ZPHYF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GSRFF is a better buy in the long-term than ZPHYF.

Price Growth

GSRFF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -16.69% price change this week, while ZPHYF (@Precious Metals) price change was -19.91% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -3.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.54%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-3.68% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GSRFF($10.2M) has a higher market cap than ZPHYF($5.36M). ZPHYF YTD gains are higher at: -71.498 vs. GSRFF (-80.115). ZPHYF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -668.77K vs. GSRFF (-6.84M). GSRFF has more cash in the bank: 5.09M vs. ZPHYF (195K). GSRFF (0) and ZPHYF (0) have equivalent revenues.
GSRFFZPHYFGSRFF / ZPHYF
Capitalization10.2M5.36M190%
EBITDA-6.84M-668.77K1,022%
Gain YTD-80.115-71.498112%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash5.09M195K2,608%
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ZPHYF: Fundamental Ratings
ZPHYF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
12
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
26
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
91
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME31.261.82
+6.18%
GameStop Corp
TSLA479.8616.84
+3.64%
Tesla
AAPL253.482.44
+0.97%
Apple
BTC.X106140.600000110.890625
+0.10%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY604.29-2.50
-0.41%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust

GSRFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GSRFF and EXNRF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GSRFF and EXNRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GSRFF
1D Price
Change %
GSRFF100%
N/A
EXNRF - GSRFF
26%
Poorly correlated
+3.50%
PMCCF - GSRFF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BLAGF - GSRFF
21%
Poorly correlated
-7.73%
ZPHYF - GSRFF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.72%
LGCFF - GSRFF
10%
Poorly correlated
-0.60%
More

ZPHYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ZPHYF and SPAZF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ZPHYF and SPAZF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ZPHYF
1D Price
Change %
ZPHYF100%
+1.72%
SPAZF - ZPHYF
22%
Poorly correlated
-3.05%
GSRFF - ZPHYF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AUMBF - ZPHYF
16%
Poorly correlated
+0.82%
GLDG - ZPHYF
1%
Poorly correlated
-1.83%
ZIJMY - ZPHYF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More