GSRCF
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.03 (-33.33%)
Updated
Dec 5 closing price
SPAZF
Price
$0.07
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
Ad is loading...

GSRCF vs SPAZF

Header iconGSRCF vs SPAZF Comparison
Open Charts GSRCF vs SPAZFBanner chart's image
GSP RESOURCE
Price$0.06
Change-$0.03 (-33.33%)
Volume$1.5K
CapitalizationN/A
Spanish Mountain Gold
Price$0.07
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$69.59K
CapitalizationN/A
GSRCF vs SPAZF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GSRCF vs. SPAZF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSRCF is a Hold and SPAZF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (GSRCF: $0.06 vs. SPAZF: $0.07)
Brand notoriety: GSRCF and SPAZF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GSRCF: 9% vs. SPAZF: 34%
Market capitalization -- GSRCF: $1.71M vs. SPAZF: $51.69M
GSRCF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $1.71M. SPAZF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $51.69M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GSRCF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSPAZF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GSRCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SPAZF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both GSRCF and SPAZF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Price Growth

GSRCF (@Precious Metals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SPAZF (@Precious Metals) price change was -6.54% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -3.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.54%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-3.68% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SPAZF($51.7M) has a higher market cap than GSRCF($1.71M). GSRCF YTD gains are higher at: -25.847 vs. SPAZF (-50.000). GSRCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -277.32K vs. SPAZF (-1.24M). SPAZF has more cash in the bank: 1.33M vs. GSRCF (152K). GSRCF (0) and SPAZF (0) have equivalent revenues.
GSRCFSPAZFGSRCF / SPAZF
Capitalization1.71M51.7M3%
EBITDA-277.32K-1.24M22%
Gain YTD-25.847-50.00052%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash152K1.33M11%
Total DebtN/A373K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SPAZF: Fundamental Ratings
SPAZF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
53
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
82
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
90
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
91
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
28
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME31.261.82
+6.18%
GameStop Corp
TSLA479.8616.84
+3.64%
Tesla
AAPL253.482.44
+0.97%
Apple
BTC.X106140.600000110.890625
+0.10%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY604.29-2.50
-0.41%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust

GSRCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GSRCF has been loosely correlated with GSISF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GSRCF jumps, then GSISF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GSRCF
1D Price
Change %
GSRCF100%
N/A
GSISF - GSRCF
43%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MMTMF - GSRCF
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.50%
CRCUF - GSRCF
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.34%
WRLGF - GSRCF
22%
Poorly correlated
-3.28%
SPAZF - GSRCF
22%
Poorly correlated
-3.05%
More

SPAZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SPAZF and LVGLF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SPAZF and LVGLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SPAZF
1D Price
Change %
SPAZF100%
-3.05%
LVGLF - SPAZF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GSRCF - SPAZF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ZPHYF - SPAZF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.72%
WRLGF - SPAZF
21%
Poorly correlated
-3.28%
SLRRF - SPAZF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More