Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSPY vs RECS
GSPY vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts GSPY vs RECS
Gotham Enhanced 500 ETF
Price$37.30
Change-$0.18 (-0.48%)
Volume$1.27K
Net Assets651.35M
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$41.24
Change-$0.17 (-0.41%)
Volume$470.82K
Net Assets4.95B
GSPY vs RECS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSPY vs. RECS commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSPY is a Hold and RECS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 4.95B vs. GSPY (651M). GSPY has a higher annual dividend yield than RECS: GSPY (1.284) vs RECS (0.979). GSPY was incepted earlier than RECS: GSPY (5 years) vs RECS (6 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than GSPY (0.50). GSPY has a higher turnover RECS (49.00) vs RECS (49.00).
| GSPY | RECS | GSPY / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | 1.284 | 0.979 | 131% |
| Net Assets | 651M | 4.95B | 13% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.15 | 333% |
| Turnover | 144.00 | 49.00 | 294% |
| Yield | 2.58 | 0.79 | 326% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| GSPY | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 1 day ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 1 day ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 1 day ago 70% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 1 day ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 1 day ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 70% | 1 day ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 90% | 1 day ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 1 day ago 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| LSRCX | 0.98 | 0.01 | +1.03% |
| Lord Abbett Small Cap Value C | |||
| BDBKX | 28.63 | 0.20 | +0.70% |
| iShares Russell 2000 Small-Cap Idx K | |||
| TRIPX | 28.76 | 0.10 | +0.35% |
| Nuveen International Eq Idx Premier | |||
| GCMCX | 27.24 | 0.02 | +0.07% |
| Goldman Sachs Mid Cap Value C | |||
| LFLTX | 16.00 | 0.01 | +0.06% |
| Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value R5 | |||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | -0.41% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | -2.45% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -3.06% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -2.40% | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | -0.75% | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | +1.63% | ||
More | ||||