Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSPRX vs RWMFX
GSPRX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts GSPRX vs RWMFX
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Equity R
Price$33.70
Change-$0.62 (-1.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.52B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$66.86
Change-$0.96 (-1.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets209.34B
GSPRX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSPRX vs. RWMFX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSPRX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 209B vs. GSPRX (1.52B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than GSPRX: RWMFX (1.41) vs GSPRX (0.17). GSPRX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: GSPRX (18 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). GSPRX (1.38) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). GSPRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). GSPRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: GSPRX (0) vs RWMFX (250). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.30 vs. GSPRX (0.01). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 47.43 vs. GSPRX (28.63).
| GSPRX | RWMFX | GSPRX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.31 | 403% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.38 | 0.31 | 445% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.509 | 11.486 | 126% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.52B | 209B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.17 | 1.41 | 12% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.01 | 5.30 | 0% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.51 | 32.83 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.63 | 47.43 | 60% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.59 | 82.53 | 44% |