Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSPRX vs RWMFX
GSPRX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts GSPRX vs RWMFX
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Equity R
Price$33.34
Change+$0.16 (+0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.48B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$66.77
Change+$0.42 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets207.25B
GSPRX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSPRX vs. RWMFX commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSPRX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 207B vs. GSPRX (1.48B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than GSPRX: RWMFX (1.43) vs GSPRX (0.18). GSPRX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: GSPRX (18 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). GSPRX (1.38) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). GSPRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). GSPRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: GSPRX (0) vs RWMFX (250). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.69 vs. GSPRX (2.90). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 57.64 vs. GSPRX (38.97).
| GSPRX | RWMFX | GSPRX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.31 | 403% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.38 | 0.31 | 445% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.286 | 9.760 | 136% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.48B | 207B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.18 | 1.43 | 13% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.90 | 5.69 | 51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.38 | 46.35 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.97 | 57.64 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.62 | 93.97 | 50% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement