Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSPRX vs RWEBX
GSPRX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts GSPRX vs RWEBX
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Equity R
Price$33.70
Change-$0.62 (-1.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.52B
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$66.38
Change-$0.95 (-1.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets209.34B
GSPRX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSPRX vs. RWEBX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSPRX is a Hold and RWEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 209B vs. GSPRX (1.52B). RWEBX pays higher dividends than GSPRX: RWEBX (0.76) vs GSPRX (0.17). GSPRX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: GSPRX (18 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). GSPRX (1.38) is less costly to investors than RWEBX (1.06). GSPRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RWEBX (29.00). GSPRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWEBX: GSPRX (0) vs RWEBX (250). RWEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.46 vs. GSPRX (0.01). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 43.13 vs. GSPRX (28.63).
| GSPRX | RWEBX | GSPRX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 1.06 | 118% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.38 | 1.06 | 130% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.509 | 10.741 | 135% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.52B | 209B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.17 | 0.76 | 23% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.01 | 4.46 | 0% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.51 | 29.97 | 125% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.63 | 43.13 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.59 | 76.27 | 48% |