Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSPPX vs RGACX
GSPPX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts GSPPX vs RGACX
Goldman Sachs Strategic Growth P
Price$15.00
Change-$0.03 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets199.86M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$82.10
Change-$0.06 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.41B
GSPPX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSPPX vs. RGACX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSPPX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. GSPPX (200M). RGACX pays higher dividends than GSPPX: RGACX (0.07) vs GSPPX (0.00). GSPPX was incepted earlier than RGACX: GSPPX (7 years) vs RGACX (23 years). GSPPX (0.95) and RGACX (0.94) have similar cost to investors . GSPPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). GSPPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: GSPPX (0) vs RGACX (250). GSPPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.92 vs. RGACX (16.51). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 42.05 vs. GSPPX (26.74).
| GSPPX | RGACX | GSPPX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.94 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.94 | 101% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.830 | 14.127 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 200M | 329B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.92 | 16.51 | 127% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.73 | 41.20 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.74 | 42.05 | 64% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 83.17 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers