Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSPPX vs RGACX
GSPPX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts GSPPX vs RGACX
Goldman Sachs Strategic Growth P
Price$15.08
Change-$0.02 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets199.83M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$83.16
Change+$0.19 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets331.65B
GSPPX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSPPX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSPPX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. GSPPX (200M). RGACX pays higher dividends than GSPPX: RGACX (0.07) vs GSPPX (0.00). GSPPX was incepted earlier than RGACX: GSPPX (7 years) vs RGACX (23 years). GSPPX (0.95) and RGACX (0.94) have similar cost to investors . GSPPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). GSPPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: GSPPX (0) vs RGACX (250). GSPPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.61 vs. RGACX (17.83). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 40.02 vs. GSPPX (22.22).
| GSPPX | RGACX | GSPPX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.94 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.94 | 101% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.202 | 15.516 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 200M | 332B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.61 | 17.83 | 121% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.74 | 58.53 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.22 | 40.02 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 95.93 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement