Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSPCX vs RWMFX
GSPCX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts GSPCX vs RWMFX
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Equity C
Price$15.56
Change+$0.05 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.51B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$68.38
Change+$0.31 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets209.48B
GSPCX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSPCX vs. RWMFX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSPCX is a Buy and RWMFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 209B vs. GSPCX (1.51B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than GSPCX: RWMFX (1.38) vs GSPCX (0.45). GSPCX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: GSPCX (28 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). GSPCX (1.88) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). GSPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSPCX: RWMFX (250) vs GSPCX (1000). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.73 vs. GSPCX (-13.26). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 44.64 vs. GSPCX (-8.42).
| GSPCX | RWMFX | GSPCX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 0.31 | 565% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.88 | 0.31 | 606% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.093 | 11.848 | 127% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.51B | 209B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 1.38 | 33% |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.26 | 4.73 | -280% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.03 | 29.75 | 30% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.42 | 44.64 | -19% |
| Returns for 10 years | -24.98 | 77.29 | -32% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement