Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSPCX vs RWMFX
GSPCX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts GSPCX vs RWMFX
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Equity C
Price$11.52
Change-$3.82 (-24.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.48B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$66.14
Change-$1.03 (-1.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets208.21B
GSPCX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSPCX vs. RWMFX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSPCX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 208B vs. GSPCX (1.48B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than GSPCX: RWMFX (1.45) vs GSPCX (0.00). GSPCX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: GSPCX (28 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). GSPCX (1.89) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). GSPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSPCX: RWMFX (250) vs GSPCX (1000). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.51 vs. GSPCX (-16.46). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 37.79 vs. GSPCX (-31.61).
| GSPCX | RWMFX | GSPCX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 0.31 | 565% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 0.31 | 610% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.524 | 1.520 | 34% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.48B | 208B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.45 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -16.46 | 5.51 | -299% |
| Returns for 3 years | -7.49 | 30.53 | -25% |
| Returns for 5 years | -31.61 | 37.79 | -84% |
| Returns for 10 years | -27.62 | 98.02 | -28% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement