Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSPCX vs RWMFX
GSPCX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts GSPCX vs RWMFX
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Equity C
Price$15.18
Change+$0.07 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.48B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$66.77
Change+$0.42 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets207.25B
GSPCX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSPCX vs. RWMFX commentary
Sep 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSPCX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 207B vs. GSPCX (1.48B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than GSPCX: RWMFX (1.43) vs GSPCX (0.47). GSPCX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: GSPCX (28 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). GSPCX (1.88) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). GSPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSPCX: RWMFX (250) vs GSPCX (1000). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.69 vs. GSPCX (-10.08). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 57.64 vs. GSPCX (0.62).
| GSPCX | RWMFX | GSPCX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 0.31 | 565% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.88 | 0.31 | 606% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.862 | 9.760 | 132% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.48B | 207B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.47 | 1.43 | 33% |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.08 | 5.69 | -177% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.35 | 46.35 | 46% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.62 | 57.64 | 1% |
| Returns for 10 years | -17.91 | 93.97 | -19% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement