Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSPCX vs RWEBX
GSPCX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts GSPCX vs RWEBX
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Equity C
Price$11.60
Change+$0.03 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.5B
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$65.45
Change+$0.26 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets209.48B
GSPCX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSPCX vs. RWEBX commentary
Dec 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSPCX is a Hold and RWEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 209B vs. GSPCX (1.5B). RWEBX pays higher dividends than GSPCX: RWEBX (0.74) vs GSPCX (0.45). GSPCX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: GSPCX (28 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). GSPCX (1.88) is less costly to investors than RWEBX (1.06). GSPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RWEBX (29.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSPCX: RWEBX (250) vs GSPCX (1000). RWEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.80 vs. GSPCX (-15.94). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 38.17 vs. GSPCX (-28.36).
| GSPCX | RWEBX | GSPCX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 1.06 | 165% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.88 | 1.06 | 177% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -13.755 | 7.648 | -180% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.5B | 209B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.74 | 61% |
| Returns for 1 year | -15.94 | 5.80 | -275% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.20 | 30.20 | 4% |
| Returns for 5 years | -28.36 | 38.17 | -74% |
| Returns for 10 years | -36.25 | 76.44 | -47% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement