Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSMGX vs TRQZX
GSMGX vs TRQZX Comparison
Open Charts GSMGX vs TRQZX
Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Growth C
Price$12.08
Change-$0.03 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.26B
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Z
Price$101.89
Change-$0.09 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.1B
GSMGX vs TRQZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSMGX vs. TRQZX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSMGX is a Hold and TRQZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRQZX has more cash in the bank: 25.1B vs. GSMGX (1.26B). TRQZX pays higher dividends than GSMGX: TRQZX (0.74) vs GSMGX (0.00). GSMGX was incepted earlier than TRQZX: GSMGX (21 years) vs TRQZX (6 years). GSMGX (2.03) is less costly to investors than TRQZX (0.61). GSMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 105.00 vs. TRQZX (22.60). TRQZX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSMGX: TRQZX (0) vs GSMGX (1000). TRQZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.38 vs. GSMGX (-18.05). TRQZX return over 5 years is better than : -9.90 vs. GSMGX (-39.69).
| GSMGX | TRQZX | GSMGX / TRQZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.99 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.03 | 0.61 | 333% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.965 | 3.631 | 164% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.26B | 25.1B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.74 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -18.05 | 1.38 | -1,304% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.49 | 10.53 | -5% |
| Returns for 5 years | -39.69 | -9.90 | 401% |
| Returns for 10 years | -21.30 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers