Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSMGX vs PMBPX
GSMGX vs PMBPX Comparison
Open Charts GSMGX vs PMBPX
Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Growth C
Price$14.11
Change-$0.47 (-3.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.35B
GSMGX vs PMBPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSMGX vs. PMBPX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSMGX is a Buy and PMBPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBPX has more cash in the bank: 32B vs. GSMGX (1.35B). PMBPX pays higher dividends than GSMGX: PMBPX (0.01) vs GSMGX (0.00). GSMGX was incepted earlier than PMBPX: GSMGX (20 years) vs PMBPX (25 years). GSMGX (2.03) is less costly to investors than PMBPX (0.83). GSMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. PMBPX (10.50). PMBPX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSMGX: PMBPX (0) vs GSMGX (1000). PMBPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.82 vs. GSMGX (-6.00). PMBPX return over 5 years is better than : 31.53 vs. GSMGX (-28.88).
| GSMGX | PMBPX | GSMGX / PMBPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.99 | 0.83 | 240% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.03 | 0.83 | 245% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.069 | 2.922 | 2% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.35B | 32B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.01 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.00 | -4.82 | 124% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.80 | 34.82 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | -28.88 | 31.53 | -92% |
| Returns for 10 years | -17.81 | 106.99 | -17% |