Advertisement
GSLC vs SNPS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSLC is a Hold and SNPS is a Hold.
SNPS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 25 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 81 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 47 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 66 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 32 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| GSLC | SNPS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 42% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 66% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 67% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 61% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 68% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 59% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 63% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 61% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| UDI | 32.78 | 0.31 | +0.96% |
| USCF Dividend Income ETF | |||
| SIXA | 51.21 | 0.38 | +0.75% |
| ETC 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF | |||
| LDRI | 25.23 | 0.01 | +0.04% |
| iShares iBonds 1-5 Year TIPS Ladder ETF | |||
| MID | 67.37 | -0.11 | -0.16% |
| American Century Mid Cap Gr Impact ETF | |||
| LRGF | 69.80 | -0.43 | -0.61% |
| iShares U.S. Equity Factor ETF | |||
GSLC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GSLC has been closely correlated with ARES. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GSLC jumps, then ARES could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GSLC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSLC | 100% | -0.56% | ||
| ARES - GSLC | 75% Closely correlated | +0.42% | ||
| FTV - GSLC | 73% Closely correlated | +1.98% | ||
| CDNS - GSLC | 72% Closely correlated | -3.06% | ||
| SNPS - GSLC | 71% Closely correlated | -1.26% | ||
| LRCX - GSLC | 70% Closely correlated | -2.61% | ||
More | ||||
SNPS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SNPS has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SNPS jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SNPS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNPS | 100% | -1.26% | ||
| CDNS - SNPS | 88% Closely correlated | -3.06% | ||
| PDFS - SNPS | 66% Closely correlated | +1.32% | ||
| ROP - SNPS | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.51% | ||
| BSY - SNPS | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.33% | ||
| CLSK - SNPS | 55% Loosely correlated | +6.29% | ||
More | ||||