Advertisement
GSLC vs SNPS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSLC is a Hold and SNPS is a Buy.
SNPS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 67 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 82 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 62 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 78 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| GSLC | SNPS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 68% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 60% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 54% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 86% | 20 days ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 58% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 64% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| EVG | 11.01 | 0.04 | +0.36% |
| Eaton Vance Short Duration Diversified Income Fund | |||
| MHD | 11.94 | 0.03 | +0.25% |
| Blackrock Muniholdings Fund | |||
| TLH | 101.10 | 0.17 | +0.17% |
| iShares 10-20 Year Treasury Bond ETF | |||
| FLAG | 27.66 | N/A | N/A |
| Global X S&P 500 U.S. Market Leaders Top 50 ETF | |||
| BJK | 37.08 | -0.42 | -1.11% |
| VanEck Gaming ETF | |||
GSLC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GSLC has been closely correlated with ARES. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GSLC jumps, then ARES could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GSLC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSLC | 100% | -0.99% | ||
| ARES - GSLC | 75% Closely correlated | -10.15% | ||
| FTV - GSLC | 73% Closely correlated | +1.21% | ||
| CDNS - GSLC | 72% Closely correlated | -7.15% | ||
| SNPS - GSLC | 71% Closely correlated | -8.46% | ||
| LRCX - GSLC | 70% Closely correlated | -3.12% | ||
More | ||||
SNPS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SNPS has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SNPS jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SNPS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNPS | 100% | -8.46% | ||
| CDNS - SNPS | 88% Closely correlated | -7.15% | ||
| PDFS - SNPS | 66% Closely correlated | -6.34% | ||
| ROP - SNPS | 57% Loosely correlated | -6.38% | ||
| BSY - SNPS | 55% Loosely correlated | -7.16% | ||
| CLSK - SNPS | 55% Loosely correlated | +2.90% | ||
More | ||||