Advertisement
GSLC vs SNPS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSLC is a Hold and SNPS is a Buy.
SNPS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 47 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 81 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 47 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 66 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| GSLC | SNPS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 56% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 60% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 64% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 68% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 5 days ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 74% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 57% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 64% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| TLH | 102.07 | 0.45 | +0.44% |
| iShares 10-20 Year Treasury Bond ETF | |||
| YYY | 11.73 | 0.05 | +0.39% |
| Amplify CEF High Income ETF | |||
| XHE | 89.57 | 0.20 | +0.22% |
| Stt Strt® SPDR® S&P®HlthCrEqpmntETF | |||
| CGMM | 29.54 | 0.05 | +0.17% |
| Capital Group U.S. Small & Mid Cap ETF | |||
| QTJL | 39.48 | -0.06 | -0.14% |
| Innovator Growth Accelerated Pls ETF Jul | |||
GSLC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GSLC has been closely correlated with ARES. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GSLC jumps, then ARES could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GSLC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSLC | 100% | +0.31% | ||
| ARES - GSLC | 75% Closely correlated | +0.19% | ||
| FTV - GSLC | 73% Closely correlated | -0.32% | ||
| CDNS - GSLC | 72% Closely correlated | +0.26% | ||
| SNPS - GSLC | 71% Closely correlated | +0.06% | ||
| LRCX - GSLC | 70% Closely correlated | +1.24% | ||
More | ||||
SNPS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SNPS has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SNPS jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SNPS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNPS | 100% | +0.06% | ||
| CDNS - SNPS | 88% Closely correlated | +0.26% | ||
| PDFS - SNPS | 66% Closely correlated | -0.24% | ||
| ROP - SNPS | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.41% | ||
| BSY - SNPS | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.64% | ||
| CLSK - SNPS | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.96% | ||
More | ||||