Advertisement
GSLC vs SNPS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSLC is a Buy and SNPS is a StrongBuy.
SNPS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 14 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 87 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 66 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 64 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 33 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 47 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| GSLC | SNPS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 49% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 73% | 21 days ago 57% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 56% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 52% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| IWO | 328.46 | 5.83 | +1.81% |
| iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF | |||
| PTIN | 31.63 | 0.19 | +0.61% |
| Pacer Trendpilot International ETF | |||
| EUSB | 44.02 | 0.06 | +0.14% |
| iShares ESG Advanced Universal USD BdETF | |||
| CERY | 29.80 | 0.01 | +0.03% |
| SPDR Blmbrg Enh Roll Y Cmd Stgy NoK-1ETF | |||
| ZTEN | 51.58 | N/A | N/A |
| F/M 10-Yr Invmt Grd Corp Bd ETF | |||
GSLC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GSLC has been closely correlated with ARES. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GSLC jumps, then ARES could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GSLC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSLC | 100% | +0.16% | ||
| ARES - GSLC | 75% Closely correlated | +1.33% | ||
| FTV - GSLC | 73% Closely correlated | +0.58% | ||
| CDNS - GSLC | 72% Closely correlated | +5.71% | ||
| SNPS - GSLC | 71% Closely correlated | +3.80% | ||
| LRCX - GSLC | 70% Closely correlated | +0.99% | ||
More | ||||
SNPS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SNPS has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SNPS jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SNPS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNPS | 100% | +3.80% | ||
| CDNS - SNPS | 88% Closely correlated | +5.71% | ||
| PDFS - SNPS | 66% Closely correlated | +3.60% | ||
| ROP - SNPS | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.39% | ||
| BSY - SNPS | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.50% | ||
| CLSK - SNPS | 55% Loosely correlated | +5.69% | ||
More | ||||