Advertisement
GSLC vs LRCX
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSLC is a Hold and LRCX is a Hold.
LRCX | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 76 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 74 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 9 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 17 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 2 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 10 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| GSLC | LRCX | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 52% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 66% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 77% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| AUSF | 48.00 | 0.37 | +0.77% |
| Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF | |||
| WBIG | 23.83 | 0.09 | +0.39% |
| WBI BullBear Yield 3000 ETF | |||
| SPBX | 27.63 | -0.04 | -0.13% |
| AllianzIM 6 Month Buffer10 Allocation ETF | |||
| GTEK | 41.36 | -0.42 | -1.01% |
| Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Eq ETF | |||
| MGK | 408.57 | -5.56 | -1.34% |
| Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF | |||
GSLC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GSLC has been closely correlated with ARES. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GSLC jumps, then ARES could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GSLC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSLC | 100% | -0.56% | ||
| ARES - GSLC | 75% Closely correlated | +0.42% | ||
| FTV - GSLC | 73% Closely correlated | +1.98% | ||
| CDNS - GSLC | 72% Closely correlated | -3.06% | ||
| SNPS - GSLC | 71% Closely correlated | -1.26% | ||
| LRCX - GSLC | 70% Closely correlated | -2.61% | ||
More | ||||
LRCX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LRCX has been closely correlated with KLAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LRCX jumps, then KLAC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LRCX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LRCX | 100% | -2.61% | ||
| KLAC - LRCX | 91% Closely correlated | -0.51% | ||
| AMAT - LRCX | 86% Closely correlated | -0.98% | ||
| ASML - LRCX | 81% Closely correlated | -0.51% | ||
| RMBS - LRCX | 80% Closely correlated | +5.38% | ||
| NVMI - LRCX | 80% Closely correlated | +2.07% | ||
More | ||||