Advertisement
GSLC vs LRCX
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSLC is a Hold and LRCX is a Hold.
LRCX | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 17 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 66 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 8 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 17 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 1 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 10 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| GSLC | LRCX | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 55% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 86% | 7 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 73% | 13 days ago 66% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 77% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GOVI | 27.42 | 0.04 | +0.15% |
| Invesco Equal Weight 0-30 Years Trs ETF | |||
| DVIN | 28.93 | N/A | N/A |
| WEBs Industrials XLI Defined Vol ETF | |||
| HYXF | 47.17 | -0.01 | -0.02% |
| iShares ESG Advanced Hi Yld Corp Bd ETF | |||
| XIMR | 30.97 | -0.01 | -0.03% |
| FT Vest U.S. Eq Buf & Prm Inc ETF - Mar | |||
| VT | 145.61 | -0.54 | -0.37% |
| Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | |||
GSLC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GSLC has been closely correlated with ARES. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GSLC jumps, then ARES could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GSLC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSLC | 100% | -0.99% | ||
| ARES - GSLC | 75% Closely correlated | -10.15% | ||
| FTV - GSLC | 73% Closely correlated | +1.21% | ||
| CDNS - GSLC | 72% Closely correlated | -7.15% | ||
| SNPS - GSLC | 71% Closely correlated | -8.46% | ||
| LRCX - GSLC | 70% Closely correlated | -3.12% | ||
More | ||||
LRCX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LRCX has been closely correlated with AMAT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LRCX jumps, then AMAT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LRCX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LRCX | 100% | -3.12% | ||
| AMAT - LRCX | 88% Closely correlated | -2.96% | ||
| KLAC - LRCX | 88% Closely correlated | -3.89% | ||
| NVMI - LRCX | 80% Closely correlated | -1.87% | ||
| ASML - LRCX | 80% Closely correlated | -3.16% | ||
| RMBS - LRCX | 80% Closely correlated | -13.42% | ||
More | ||||