Advertisement
GSLC vs LRCX
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSLC is a Buy and LRCX is a Hold.
LRCX | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 80 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 49 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 17 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 18 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 3 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 16 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 47 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| GSLC | LRCX | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 60% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 72% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 56% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 66% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 77% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BFEB | 47.17 | 0.28 | +0.60% |
| Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF™ - Feb | |||
| PGF | 14.57 | 0.02 | +0.14% |
| Invesco Financial Preferred ETF | |||
| SHY | 83.08 | -0.01 | -0.02% |
| iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF | |||
| CGHM | 25.58 | -0.03 | -0.12% |
| Capital Group Municipal High-Income ETF | |||
| IBIJ | 26.26 | -0.06 | -0.25% |
| iShares iBonds Oct 2033 Term Tips ETF | |||
GSLC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GSLC has been closely correlated with ARES. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GSLC jumps, then ARES could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GSLC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSLC | 100% | +0.63% | ||
| ARES - GSLC | 75% Closely correlated | +0.45% | ||
| FTV - GSLC | 73% Closely correlated | -0.06% | ||
| CDNS - GSLC | 72% Closely correlated | +0.58% | ||
| SNPS - GSLC | 71% Closely correlated | +1.69% | ||
| LRCX - GSLC | 70% Closely correlated | -0.60% | ||
More | ||||
LRCX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LRCX has been closely correlated with AMAT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LRCX jumps, then AMAT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LRCX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LRCX | 100% | -0.60% | ||
| AMAT - LRCX | 92% Closely correlated | -1.20% | ||
| KLAC - LRCX | 90% Closely correlated | +0.72% | ||
| VECO - LRCX | 80% Closely correlated | -0.51% | ||
| RMBS - LRCX | 80% Closely correlated | -1.93% | ||
| ENTG - LRCX | 79% Closely correlated | +0.44% | ||
More | ||||