Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSLAX vs RMFCX
GSLAX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts GSLAX vs RMFCX
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Value A
Price$17.48
Change+$0.16 (+0.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets441.82M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$62.49
Change+$0.31 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.8B
GSLAX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSLAX vs. RMFCX commentary
Dec 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSLAX is a StrongBuy and RMFCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. GSLAX (442M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than GSLAX: RMFCX (1.18) vs GSLAX (0.97). GSLAX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: GSLAX (26 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). GSLAX (1.25) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). GSLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSLAX: RMFCX (250) vs GSLAX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.27 vs. GSLAX (-4.89). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 52.02 vs. GSLAX (17.58).
| GSLAX | RMFCX | GSLAX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.91 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.91 | 137% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.703 | 15.500 | 69% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 442M | 112B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.97 | 1.18 | 83% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.89 | 6.27 | -78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.23 | 27.68 | 41% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.58 | 52.02 | 34% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.64 | 90.44 | 13% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers