Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSLAX vs RMFCX
GSLAX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts GSLAX vs RMFCX
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Value A
Price$16.16
Change-$0.75 (-4.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets449.31M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.14
Change-$1.74 (-2.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.52B
GSLAX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSLAX vs. RMFCX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSLAX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. GSLAX (449M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than GSLAX: RMFCX (1.24) vs GSLAX (0.69). GSLAX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: GSLAX (26 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). GSLAX (1.24) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). GSLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSLAX: RMFCX (250) vs GSLAX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.45 vs. GSLAX (-1.26). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 44.16 vs. GSLAX (9.79).
| GSLAX | RMFCX | GSLAX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.91 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 0.91 | 136% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.967 | 2.244 | 266% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 449M | 112B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 1.24 | 56% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.26 | 7.45 | -17% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.70 | 28.73 | 37% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.79 | 44.16 | 22% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.21 | 105.79 | 28% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers