Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSLAX vs RMEBX
GSLAX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts GSLAX vs RMEBX
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Value A
Price$16.67
Change+$0.06 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets439M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$60.75
Change+$0.28 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.54B
GSLAX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSLAX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSLAX is a StrongBuy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. GSLAX (439M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than GSLAX: RMEBX (1.12) vs GSLAX (1.03). GSLAX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: GSLAX (26 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). GSLAX (1.25) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). GSLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSLAX: RMEBX (250) vs GSLAX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.26 vs. GSLAX (1.03). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 59.35 vs. GSLAX (30.28).
| GSLAX | RMEBX | GSLAX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 1.07 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 1.07 | 117% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.573 | 11.253 | 50% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 439M | 111B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.03 | 1.12 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.03 | 11.26 | 9% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.10 | 30.31 | 56% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.28 | 59.35 | 51% |
| Returns for 10 years | 4.00 | 80.17 | 5% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers