Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSLAX vs RMEBX
GSLAX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts GSLAX vs RMEBX
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Value A
Price$17.04
Change+$0.18 (+1.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets430.75M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$62.36
Change+$0.51 (+0.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.18B
GSLAX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSLAX vs. RMEBX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSLAX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. GSLAX (431M). RMEBX (1.05) and GSLAX (1.00) have matching dividends . GSLAX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: GSLAX (26 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). GSLAX (1.25) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). GSLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSLAX: RMEBX (250) vs GSLAX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.81 vs. GSLAX (-6.55). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 55.95 vs. GSLAX (24.31).
| GSLAX | RMEBX | GSLAX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 1.07 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 1.07 | 117% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.776 | 13.527 | 50% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 431M | 111B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.00 | 1.05 | 96% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.55 | 4.81 | -136% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.06 | 38.19 | 53% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.31 | 55.95 | 43% |
| Returns for 10 years | 9.59 | 89.36 | 11% |