GSISF
Price
$1.45
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 4 closing price
WKGFF
Price
$0.07
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 1 closing price
Ad is loading...

GSISF vs WKGFF

Header iconGSISF vs WKGFF Comparison
Open Charts GSISF vs WKGFFBanner chart's image
Genesis Minerals
Price$1.45
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$4.02K
CapitalizationN/A
Westkam Gold
Price$0.07
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2K
CapitalizationN/A
GSISF vs WKGFF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GSISF vs. WKGFF commentary
Nov 16, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSISF is a Hold and WKGFF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 16, 2024
Stock price -- (GSISF: $1.45 vs. WKGFF: $0.07)
Brand notoriety: GSISF and WKGFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GSISF: 231% vs. WKGFF: 90%
Market capitalization -- GSISF: $1.02B vs. WKGFF: $1.29M
GSISF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $1.02B. WKGFF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $1.29M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GSISF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWKGFF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GSISF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WKGFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both GSISF and WKGFF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Price Growth

GSISF (@Precious Metals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while WKGFF (@Precious Metals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -4.55%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.85%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-4.55% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GSISF($1.02B) has a higher market cap than WKGFF($1.29M). WKGFF YTD gains are higher at: 70.814 vs. GSISF (20.833). WKGFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -560 vs. GSISF (-40.57M). GSISF has more cash in the bank: 11.1M vs. WKGFF (68.3K). GSISF has higher revenues than WKGFF: GSISF (11M) vs WKGFF (0).
GSISFWKGFFGSISF / WKGFF
Capitalization1.02B1.29M79,160%
EBITDA-40.57M-5607,244,101%
Gain YTD20.83370.81429%
P/E Ratio0.99N/A-
Revenue11M0-
Total Cash11.1M68.3K16,252%
Total DebtN/A5.99K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
WKGFF: Fundamental Ratings
WKGFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
34
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
20
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
99
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
61
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME27.370.91
+3.44%
GameStop Corp
AAPL228.223.10
+1.38%
Apple
SPY593.35-3.84
-0.64%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X87250.430000-3333.734400
-3.68%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA311.18-19.06
-5.77%
Tesla

GSISF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GSISF has been loosely correlated with GSRCF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GSISF jumps, then GSRCF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GSISF
1D Price
Change %
GSISF100%
N/A
GSRCF - GSISF
43%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MMTMF - GSISF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MJGCF - GSISF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JNCCF - GSISF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FFOXF - GSISF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

WKGFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WKGFF and XPRCF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WKGFF and XPRCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WKGFF
1D Price
Change %
WKGFF100%
N/A
XPRCF - WKGFF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GSISF - WKGFF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WEXPF - WKGFF
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.25%
KLGDF - WKGFF
22%
Poorly correlated
-19.53%
TDRRF - WKGFF
21%
Poorly correlated
+6.56%
More