GSISF
Price
$4.23
Change
+$0.03 (+0.71%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
5.06B
WHGOF
Price
$0.77
Change
-$0.03 (-3.75%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
171.18M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GSISF vs WHGOF

Header iconGSISF vs WHGOF Comparison
Open Charts GSISF vs WHGOFBanner chart's image
Genesis Minerals
Price$4.23
Change+$0.03 (+0.71%)
Volume$600
Capitalization5.06B
White Gold
Price$0.77
Change-$0.03 (-3.75%)
Volume$197.68K
Capitalization171.18M
GSISF vs WHGOF Comparison Chart in %
GSISF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WHGOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GSISF vs. WHGOF commentary
Oct 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSISF is a Hold and WHGOF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2025
Stock price -- (GSISF: $4.23 vs. WHGOF: $0.77)
Brand notoriety: GSISF and WHGOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GSISF: 42% vs. WHGOF: 87%
Market capitalization -- GSISF: $5.06B vs. WHGOF: $171.18M
GSISF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $5.06B. WHGOF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $171.18M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $112.26B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.48B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GSISF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWHGOF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GSISF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WHGOF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GSISF is a better buy in the long-term than WHGOF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GSISF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WHGOF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GSISF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • WHGOF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GSISF is a better buy in the short-term than WHGOF.

Price Growth

GSISF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +7.50% price change this week, while WHGOF (@Precious Metals) price change was -11.84% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +17.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1194.07%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.57% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GSISF($5.06B) has a higher market cap than WHGOF($171M). WHGOF YTD gains are higher at: 381.640 vs. GSISF (153.293). GSISF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 463M vs. WHGOF (-2.47M). GSISF has more cash in the bank: 240M vs. WHGOF (3.53M). GSISF has higher revenues than WHGOF: GSISF (920M) vs WHGOF (0).
GSISFWHGOFGSISF / WHGOF
Capitalization5.06B171M2,959%
EBITDA463M-2.47M-18,727%
Gain YTD153.293381.64040%
P/E Ratio35.24N/A-
Revenue920M0-
Total Cash240M3.53M6,805%
Total Debt201MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
WHGOF: Fundamental Ratings
WHGOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
80
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
37
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
94
SMR RATING
1..100
93
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
34
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GSISFWHGOF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 30 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GSISF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WHGOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CSIIX8.83N/A
N/A
Copeland International Small Cap I
ACEVX10.97-0.01
-0.09%
American Century International Val Inv
ABCEX10.07-0.03
-0.30%
AB Emerging Markets Multi-Asset C
PIEIX34.25-0.11
-0.32%
Principal Glb Emerging Markets Inst
ANTMX11.98-0.06
-0.50%
American Century Intl Sm-Md Cp G

GSISF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GSISF has been loosely correlated with DTARF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GSISF jumps, then DTARF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GSISF
1D Price
Change %
GSISF100%
+0.71%
DTARF - GSISF
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.85%
STBMF - GSISF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WHGOF - GSISF
30%
Poorly correlated
-3.31%
MAIFF - GSISF
26%
Poorly correlated
-5.36%
PMCOF - GSISF
24%
Poorly correlated
-6.92%
More

WHGOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WHGOF and GSISF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WHGOF and GSISF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WHGOF
1D Price
Change %
WHGOF100%
-3.31%
GSISF - WHGOF
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.71%
ZIJMF - WHGOF
29%
Poorly correlated
-3.83%
AU - WHGOF
26%
Poorly correlated
-5.97%
TORXF - WHGOF
25%
Poorly correlated
-6.47%
HMY - WHGOF
25%
Poorly correlated
-8.86%
More