GSISF
Price
$3.35
Change
-$0.22 (-6.16%)
Updated
Sep 19 closing price
Capitalization
4.26B
MMTMF
Price
$0.46
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
152.16M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GSISF vs MMTMF

Header iconGSISF vs MMTMF Comparison
Open Charts GSISF vs MMTMFBanner chart's image
Genesis Minerals
Price$3.35
Change-$0.22 (-6.16%)
Volume$428
Capitalization4.26B
Monument Mining
Price$0.46
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$7.5K
Capitalization152.16M
GSISF vs MMTMF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GSISF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MMTMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GSISF vs. MMTMF commentary
Sep 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSISF is a Hold and MMTMF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 25, 2025
Stock price -- (GSISF: $3.35 vs. MMTMF: $0.46)
Brand notoriety: GSISF and MMTMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GSISF: 29% vs. MMTMF: 18%
Market capitalization -- GSISF: $4.26B vs. MMTMF: $152.16M
GSISF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $4.26B. MMTMF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $152.16M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $97.88B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GSISF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMMTMF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GSISF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MMTMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both GSISF and MMTMF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GSISF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MMTMF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GSISF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MMTMF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GSISF is a better buy in the short-term than MMTMF.

Price Growth

GSISF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -9.70% price change this week, while MMTMF (@Precious Metals) price change was -3.25% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +4.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +29.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6005.04%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+4.48% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GSISF($4.26B) has a higher market cap than MMTMF($152M). GSISF has higher P/E ratio than MMTMF: GSISF (25.93) vs MMTMF (6.67). MMTMF YTD gains are higher at: 149.973 vs. GSISF (100.599). GSISF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 463M vs. MMTMF (42.6M). GSISF has more cash in the bank: 240M vs. MMTMF (29.2M). MMTMF has less debt than GSISF: MMTMF (115K) vs GSISF (201M). GSISF has higher revenues than MMTMF: GSISF (920M) vs MMTMF (77.6M).
GSISFMMTMFGSISF / MMTMF
Capitalization4.26B152M2,805%
EBITDA463M42.6M1,087%
Gain YTD100.599149.97367%
P/E Ratio25.936.67389%
Revenue920M77.6M1,186%
Total Cash240M29.2M822%
Total Debt201M115K174,783%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MMTMF: Fundamental Ratings
MMTMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
73
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
14
SMR RATING
1..100
49
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
36
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
85
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GSISFMMTMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GSISF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MMTMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JPMO17.100.10
+0.59%
YieldMax JPM Option Income Strategy ETF
BCD34.040.03
+0.09%
abrdn Blmb AllCmdLDSK1Fr ETF
JPEF73.82-0.03
-0.04%
JPMorgan Equity Focus ETF
VCRM75.05-0.31
-0.41%
Vanguard Core Tax-Exempt Bond ETF
IOPP27.25-0.23
-0.85%
Simplify Tara India Opportunities ETF

GSISF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GSISF has been loosely correlated with MMTMF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GSISF jumps, then MMTMF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GSISF
1D Price
Change %
GSISF100%
N/A
MMTMF - GSISF
34%
Loosely correlated
+1.64%
MJGCF - GSISF
31%
Poorly correlated
-1.67%
KSSRF - GSISF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WKGFF - GSISF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CLGCF - GSISF
23%
Poorly correlated
+48.36%
More

MMTMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MMTMF has been loosely correlated with GSISF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MMTMF jumps, then GSISF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MMTMF
1D Price
Change %
MMTMF100%
+1.64%
GSISF - MMTMF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
AUGO - MMTMF
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.51%
MJGCF - MMTMF
3%
Poorly correlated
-1.67%
MMRGF - MMTMF
-8%
Poorly correlated
-7.24%