GSISF
Price
$3.15
Change
+$0.10 (+3.28%)
Updated
Sep 2 closing price
Capitalization
3.78B
MJGCF
Price
$0.11
Change
+$0.01 (+10.00%)
Updated
Sep 2 closing price
Capitalization
115.73M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GSISF vs MJGCF

Header iconGSISF vs MJGCF Comparison
Open Charts GSISF vs MJGCFBanner chart's image
Genesis Minerals
Price$3.15
Change+$0.10 (+3.28%)
Volume$572
Capitalization3.78B
Majestic Gold
Price$0.11
Change+$0.01 (+10.00%)
Volume$222.33K
Capitalization115.73M
GSISF vs MJGCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GSISF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MJGCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GSISF vs. MJGCF commentary
Sep 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSISF is a Buy and MJGCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 03, 2025
Stock price -- (GSISF: $3.15 vs. MJGCF: $0.11)
Brand notoriety: GSISF and MJGCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GSISF: 31% vs. MJGCF: 218%
Market capitalization -- GSISF: $3.78B vs. MJGCF: $115.73M
GSISF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $3.78B. MJGCF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $115.73M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $91.29B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GSISF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMJGCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GSISF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MJGCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MJGCF is a better buy in the long-term than GSISF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GSISF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MJGCF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GSISF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MJGCF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GSISF is a better buy in the short-term than MJGCF.

Price Growth

GSISF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +3.62% price change this week, while MJGCF (@Precious Metals) price change was -11.44% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +7.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +22.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3851.45%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+7.10% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GSISF($3.78B) has a higher market cap than MJGCF($116M). GSISF has higher P/E ratio than MJGCF: GSISF (24.59) vs MJGCF (9.90). MJGCF YTD gains are higher at: 100.612 vs. GSISF (88.623).
GSISFMJGCFGSISF / MJGCF
Capitalization3.78B116M3,259%
EBITDAN/A42M-
Gain YTD88.623100.61288%
P/E Ratio24.599.90248%
RevenueN/A74.9M-
Total CashN/A23.8M-
Total DebtN/A16.9M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MJGCF: Fundamental Ratings
MJGCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
65
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
64
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
43
SMR RATING
1..100
73
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
43
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GSISFMJGCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bullish Trend 27 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
42%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GSISF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MJGCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FLYD6.730.22
+3.37%
MicroSectors™ Travel -3X Inv Lvgd ETNs
ERX57.640.18
+0.31%
Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X ETF
FMED24.550.05
+0.19%
Fidelity Disruptive Medicine ETF
DFIP42.23-0.09
-0.21%
Dimensional Inflation-Protected Sec ETF
STXI29.12-0.28
-0.96%
Strive International Developed Mkts ETF

GSISF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GSISF has been loosely correlated with MMTMF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GSISF jumps, then MMTMF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GSISF
1D Price
Change %
GSISF100%
+3.28%
MMTMF - GSISF
34%
Loosely correlated
+11.90%
MJGCF - GSISF
31%
Poorly correlated
+9.22%
KSSRF - GSISF
24%
Poorly correlated
+26.32%
WKGFF - GSISF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CLGCF - GSISF
23%
Poorly correlated
+6.15%
More

MJGCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MJGCF and GSISF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MJGCF and GSISF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MJGCF
1D Price
Change %
MJGCF100%
+9.22%
GSISF - MJGCF
31%
Poorly correlated
+3.28%
PMDRF - MJGCF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BYAGF - MJGCF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.33%
MMTMF - MJGCF
3%
Poorly correlated
+11.90%
MGMLF - MJGCF
-2%
Poorly correlated
-3.83%
More