GSISF
Price
$2.80
Change
-$0.06 (-2.10%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
1.02B
MJGCF
Price
$0.11
Change
-$0.01 (-8.33%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
70.79M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GSISF vs MJGCF

Header iconGSISF vs MJGCF Comparison
Open Charts GSISF vs MJGCFBanner chart's image
Genesis Minerals
Price$2.80
Change-$0.06 (-2.10%)
Volume$286
Capitalization1.02B
Majestic Gold
Price$0.11
Change-$0.01 (-8.33%)
Volume$47.8K
Capitalization70.79M
GSISF vs MJGCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GSISF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MJGCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GSISF vs. MJGCF commentary
Jun 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSISF is a Hold and MJGCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 29, 2025
Stock price -- (GSISF: $2.80 vs. MJGCF: $0.11)
Brand notoriety: GSISF and MJGCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GSISF: 34% vs. MJGCF: 70%
Market capitalization -- GSISF: $1.02B vs. MJGCF: $70.79M
GSISF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $1.02B. MJGCF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $70.79M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GSISF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMJGCF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • GSISF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MJGCF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MJGCF is a better buy in the long-term than GSISF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GSISF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MJGCF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GSISF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MJGCF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MJGCF is a better buy in the short-term than GSISF.

Price Growth

GSISF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -6.82% price change this week, while MJGCF (@Precious Metals) price change was -7.81% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.26%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.06% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GSISF($1.02B) has a higher market cap than MJGCF($70.8M). MJGCF has higher P/E ratio than GSISF: MJGCF (25.58) vs GSISF (0.99). MJGCF YTD gains are higher at: 105.659 vs. GSISF (67.383). MJGCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 31.9M vs. GSISF (-40.57M). MJGCF has more cash in the bank: 58.2M vs. GSISF (11.1M). MJGCF has higher revenues than GSISF: MJGCF (60.1M) vs GSISF (11M).
GSISFMJGCFGSISF / MJGCF
Capitalization1.02B70.8M1,438%
EBITDA-40.57M31.9M-127%
Gain YTD67.383105.65964%
P/E Ratio0.9925.584%
Revenue11M60.1M18%
Total Cash11.1M58.2M19%
Total DebtN/A4.44M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MJGCF: Fundamental Ratings
MJGCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
80
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
61
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
26
SMR RATING
1..100
70
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
35
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GSISFMJGCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
25%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GSISF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MJGCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AIIYX23.880.20
+0.84%
Invesco EQV International Equity Y
AGVHX26.370.19
+0.73%
American Funds Global Insight F-3
ECTMX16.720.08
+0.48%
Eaton Vance Dividend Builder C
ITEIX11.100.05
+0.45%
VY® T. Rowe Price Equity Income I
CDGIX15.030.06
+0.40%
Crawford Large Cap Dividend I

GSISF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GSISF has been loosely correlated with GSRCF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GSISF jumps, then GSRCF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GSISF
1D Price
Change %
GSISF100%
N/A
GSRCF - GSISF
43%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MMTMF - GSISF
34%
Loosely correlated
-2.62%
MJGCF - GSISF
31%
Poorly correlated
-5.82%
FFOXF - GSISF
26%
Poorly correlated
+3.53%
KSSRF - GSISF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MJGCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MJGCF and GSISF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MJGCF and GSISF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MJGCF
1D Price
Change %
MJGCF100%
-5.82%
GSISF - MJGCF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PMDRF - MJGCF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BYAGF - MJGCF
25%
Poorly correlated
-4.11%
ACRG - MJGCF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GMDMF - MJGCF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More