GSISF
Price
$2.80
Change
-$0.06 (-2.10%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
1.02B
KSSRF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.01 (-20.00%)
Updated
Jun 18 closing price
Capitalization
2.12M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GSISF vs KSSRF

Header iconGSISF vs KSSRF Comparison
Open Charts GSISF vs KSSRFBanner chart's image
Genesis Minerals
Price$2.80
Change-$0.06 (-2.10%)
Volume$286
Capitalization1.02B
Kesselrun Resources
Price$0.04
Change-$0.01 (-20.00%)
Volume$2.88K
Capitalization2.12M
GSISF vs KSSRF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GSISF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KSSRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GSISF vs. KSSRF commentary
Jun 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSISF is a Hold and KSSRF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 29, 2025
Stock price -- (GSISF: $2.80 vs. KSSRF: $0.04)
Brand notoriety: GSISF and KSSRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GSISF: 34% vs. KSSRF: 7%
Market capitalization -- GSISF: $1.02B vs. KSSRF: $2.12M
GSISF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $1.02B. KSSRF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $2.12M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GSISF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileKSSRF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GSISF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • KSSRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both GSISF and KSSRF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GSISF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KSSRF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GSISF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • KSSRF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, KSSRF is a better buy in the short-term than GSISF.

Price Growth

GSISF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -6.82% price change this week, while KSSRF (@Precious Metals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.26%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.06% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GSISF($1.02B) has a higher market cap than KSSRF($2.12M). KSSRF has higher P/E ratio than GSISF: KSSRF (33.33) vs GSISF (0.99). GSISF (67.383) and KSSRF (66.733) have similar YTD gains . KSSRF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -97.26K vs. GSISF (-40.57M). GSISF has more cash in the bank: 11.1M vs. KSSRF (827K). GSISF has higher revenues than KSSRF: GSISF (11M) vs KSSRF (0).
GSISFKSSRFGSISF / KSSRF
Capitalization1.02B2.12M48,019%
EBITDA-40.57M-97.26K41,709%
Gain YTD67.38366.733101%
P/E Ratio0.9933.333%
Revenue11M0-
Total Cash11.1M827K1,342%
Total DebtN/A124K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KSSRF: Fundamental Ratings
KSSRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
90
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
90
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
94
SMR RATING
1..100
91
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
35
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GSISFKSSRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
25%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GSISF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KSSRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FUL61.735.77
+10.31%
HB Fuller Company
CRDF3.15-0.01
-0.32%
Cardiff Oncology
TEL166.87-2.18
-1.29%
TE CONNECTIVITY Ltd
PLYM16.09-0.29
-1.77%
Plymouth Industrial REIT
TXMD1.12-0.05
-4.27%
TherapeuticsMD

GSISF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GSISF has been loosely correlated with GSRCF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GSISF jumps, then GSRCF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GSISF
1D Price
Change %
GSISF100%
N/A
GSRCF - GSISF
43%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MMTMF - GSISF
34%
Loosely correlated
-2.62%
MJGCF - GSISF
31%
Poorly correlated
-5.82%
FFOXF - GSISF
26%
Poorly correlated
+3.53%
KSSRF - GSISF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

KSSRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KSSRF and STBMF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KSSRF and STBMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KSSRF
1D Price
Change %
KSSRF100%
N/A
STBMF - KSSRF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PMDRF - KSSRF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GSISF - KSSRF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BYAGF - KSSRF
22%
Poorly correlated
-4.11%
WKGFF - KSSRF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.43%
More