GSHRF
Price
$0.31
Change
-$0.01 (-3.12%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
144.34M
RDGMF
Price
$0.13
Change
-$0.01 (-7.14%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
18.31M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GSHRF vs RDGMF

Header iconGSHRF vs RDGMF Comparison
Open Charts GSHRF vs RDGMFBanner chart's image
Goldshore Resources
Price$0.31
Change-$0.01 (-3.12%)
Volume$21.69K
Capitalization144.34M
RIDGELINE MINERALS
Price$0.13
Change-$0.01 (-7.14%)
Volume$134.77K
Capitalization18.31M
GSHRF vs RDGMF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GSHRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RDGMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GSHRF vs. RDGMF commentary
Aug 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSHRF is a Hold and RDGMF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 11, 2025
Stock price -- (GSHRF: $0.31 vs. RDGMF: $0.13)
Brand notoriety: GSHRF and RDGMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GSHRF: 39% vs. RDGMF: 105%
Market capitalization -- GSHRF: $144.34M vs. RDGMF: $18.31M
GSHRF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $144.34M. RDGMF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $18.31M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $76.48B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.45B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GSHRF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRDGMF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GSHRF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RDGMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both GSHRF and RDGMF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GSHRF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RDGMF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GSHRF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • RDGMF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RDGMF is a better buy in the short-term than GSHRF.

Price Growth

GSHRF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +0.52% price change this week, while RDGMF (@Precious Metals) price change was +1.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +19.59%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4669.57%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+19.59% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GSHRF($144M) has a higher market cap than RDGMF($18.3M). GSHRF YTD gains are higher at: 84.735 vs. RDGMF (38.211). RDGMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.3M vs. GSHRF (-3.39M). GSHRF has more cash in the bank: 10.5M vs. RDGMF (2.69M). RDGMF has less debt than GSHRF: RDGMF (164K) vs GSHRF (187K). GSHRF (0) and RDGMF (0) have equivalent revenues.
GSHRFRDGMFGSHRF / RDGMF
Capitalization144M18.3M787%
EBITDA-3.39M-1.3M262%
Gain YTD84.73538.211222%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash10.5M2.69M391%
Total Debt187K164K114%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GSHRF: Fundamental Ratings
GSHRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
42
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
84
SMR RATING
1..100
94
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
39
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GSHRFRDGMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
87%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GSHRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RDGMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RYKAX93.300.98
+1.06%
Rydex Banking H
SELCX48.030.42
+0.88%
SEI Large Cap Growth F (SIMT)
REQTX46.860.33
+0.71%
Russell Sustnbl Aware Eq S
NCGFX68.340.47
+0.69%
New Covenant Growth
FCNSX18.50-0.08
-0.43%
Fidelity Series Canada

GSHRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GSHRF and LGDTF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GSHRF and LGDTF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GSHRF
1D Price
Change %
GSHRF100%
-3.12%
LGDTF - GSHRF
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.75%
LOMLF - GSHRF
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.76%
HSTXF - GSHRF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.37%
TORXF - GSHRF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.19%
IEGCF - GSHRF
22%
Poorly correlated
+6.43%
More

RDGMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RDGMF and TORXF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RDGMF and TORXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RDGMF
1D Price
Change %
RDGMF100%
-4.79%
TORXF - RDGMF
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.19%
RIOFF - RDGMF
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.36%
LGDTF - RDGMF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.75%
TDRRF - RDGMF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.94%
GSHRF - RDGMF
20%
Poorly correlated
-3.12%
More