GSHRF
Price
$0.30
Change
-$0.02 (-6.25%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
145.94M
PAFRF
Price
$0.86
Change
+$0.06 (+7.50%)
Updated
Sep 2 closing price
Capitalization
1.87B
Interact to see
Advertisement

GSHRF vs PAFRF

Header iconGSHRF vs PAFRF Comparison
Open Charts GSHRF vs PAFRFBanner chart's image
GOLD X2 MINING
Price$0.30
Change-$0.02 (-6.25%)
Volume$52.48K
Capitalization145.94M
Pan African Resources
Price$0.86
Change+$0.06 (+7.50%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization1.87B
GSHRF vs PAFRF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GSHRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PAFRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GSHRF vs. PAFRF commentary
Sep 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSHRF is a Hold and PAFRF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 07, 2025
Stock price -- (GSHRF: $0.30 vs. PAFRF: $0.86)
Brand notoriety: GSHRF and PAFRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GSHRF: 151% vs. PAFRF: 11%
Market capitalization -- GSHRF: $145.94M vs. PAFRF: $1.87B
GSHRF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $145.94M. PAFRF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $1.87B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $94.52B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GSHRF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePAFRF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • GSHRF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PAFRF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, PAFRF is a better buy in the long-term than GSHRF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GSHRF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PAFRF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GSHRF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PAFRF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PAFRF is a better buy in the short-term than GSHRF.

Price Growth

GSHRF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +9.71% price change this week, while PAFRF (@Precious Metals) price change was +7.76% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +4.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.51%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4862.14%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+4.88% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAFRF($1.87B) has a higher market cap than GSHRF($146M). PAFRF YTD gains are higher at: 109.201 vs. GSHRF (79.789). PAFRF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 150M vs. GSHRF (-3.39M). PAFRF has more cash in the bank: 17.2M vs. GSHRF (10.5M). GSHRF has less debt than PAFRF: GSHRF (187K) vs PAFRF (242M). PAFRF has higher revenues than GSHRF: PAFRF (372M) vs GSHRF (0).
GSHRFPAFRFGSHRF / PAFRF
Capitalization146M1.87B8%
EBITDA-3.39M150M-2%
Gain YTD79.789109.20173%
P/E RatioN/A19.82-
Revenue0372M-
Total Cash10.5M17.2M61%
Total Debt187K242M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GSHRF vs PAFRF: Fundamental Ratings
GSHRF
PAFRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
847
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
37
Fair valued
15
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
856
SMR RATING
1..100
9543
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3936
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10010
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8575

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PAFRF's Valuation (15) in the null industry is in the same range as GSHRF (37). This means that PAFRF’s stock grew similarly to GSHRF’s over the last 12 months.

PAFRF's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GSHRF (85). This means that PAFRF’s stock grew significantly faster than GSHRF’s over the last 12 months.

PAFRF's SMR Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GSHRF (95). This means that PAFRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GSHRF’s over the last 12 months.

PAFRF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as GSHRF (39). This means that PAFRF’s stock grew similarly to GSHRF’s over the last 12 months.

PAFRF's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GSHRF (100). This means that PAFRF’s stock grew significantly faster than GSHRF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GSHRFPAFRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
86%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GSHRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PAFRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JUSRX27.57N/A
N/A
JPMorgan US Equity R5
GSBAX15.64N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Growth C
NSDVX22.65N/A
N/A
North Star Dividend I
RSDQX27.36N/A
N/A
Invesco Rising Dividends R5
FLMFX9.94-0.02
-0.20%
Meeder Muirfield Retail

GSHRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GSHRF and LGDTF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GSHRF and LGDTF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GSHRF
1D Price
Change %
GSHRF100%
-5.30%
LGDTF - GSHRF
28%
Poorly correlated
+2.36%
LOMLF - GSHRF
26%
Poorly correlated
+13.04%
HSTXF - GSHRF
24%
Poorly correlated
+2.65%
TORXF - GSHRF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.34%
IEGCF - GSHRF
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.73%
More

PAFRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PAFRF and GSHRF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PAFRF and GSHRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PAFRF
1D Price
Change %
PAFRF100%
N/A
GSHRF - PAFRF
22%
Poorly correlated
-5.30%
CALRF - PAFRF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A