GSHRF
Price
$0.31
Change
-$0.01 (-3.12%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
144.34M
IEGCF
Price
$0.12
Change
+$0.01 (+9.09%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
24.52M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GSHRF vs IEGCF

Header iconGSHRF vs IEGCF Comparison
Open Charts GSHRF vs IEGCFBanner chart's image
Goldshore Resources
Price$0.31
Change-$0.01 (-3.12%)
Volume$21.69K
Capitalization144.34M
Independence Gold
Price$0.12
Change+$0.01 (+9.09%)
Volume$69.42K
Capitalization24.52M
GSHRF vs IEGCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GSHRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IEGCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GSHRF vs. IEGCF commentary
Aug 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSHRF is a Hold and IEGCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 11, 2025
Stock price -- (GSHRF: $0.31 vs. IEGCF: $0.12)
Brand notoriety: GSHRF and IEGCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GSHRF: 39% vs. IEGCF: 22%
Market capitalization -- GSHRF: $144.34M vs. IEGCF: $24.52M
GSHRF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $144.34M. IEGCF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $24.52M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $76.48B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.45B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GSHRF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileIEGCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GSHRF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • IEGCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, IEGCF is a better buy in the long-term than GSHRF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GSHRF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IEGCF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GSHRF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • IEGCF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IEGCF is a better buy in the short-term than GSHRF.

Price Growth

GSHRF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +0.52% price change this week, while IEGCF (@Precious Metals) price change was +17.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +19.59%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4669.57%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+19.59% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GSHRF($144M) has a higher market cap than IEGCF($24.5M). GSHRF YTD gains are higher at: 84.735 vs. IEGCF (-13.333). GSHRF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -3.39M vs. IEGCF (-7.22M). GSHRF has more cash in the bank: 10.5M vs. IEGCF (7.49M). GSHRF has less debt than IEGCF: GSHRF (187K) vs IEGCF (217K). GSHRF (0) and IEGCF (0) have equivalent revenues.
GSHRFIEGCFGSHRF / IEGCF
Capitalization144M24.5M588%
EBITDA-3.39M-7.22M47%
Gain YTD84.735-13.333-636%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash10.5M7.49M140%
Total Debt187K217K86%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GSHRF vs IEGCF: Fundamental Ratings
GSHRF
IEGCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
42
Fair valued
46
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8460
SMR RATING
1..100
9498
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3950
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GSHRF's Valuation (42) in the null industry is in the same range as IEGCF (46). This means that GSHRF’s stock grew similarly to IEGCF’s over the last 12 months.

IEGCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (60) in the null industry is in the same range as GSHRF (84). This means that IEGCF’s stock grew similarly to GSHRF’s over the last 12 months.

GSHRF's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as IEGCF (98). This means that GSHRF’s stock grew similarly to IEGCF’s over the last 12 months.

GSHRF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as IEGCF (50). This means that GSHRF’s stock grew similarly to IEGCF’s over the last 12 months.

GSHRF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as IEGCF (100). This means that GSHRF’s stock grew similarly to IEGCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GSHRFIEGCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
87%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GSHRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IEGCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RYKAX93.300.98
+1.06%
Rydex Banking H
SELCX48.030.42
+0.88%
SEI Large Cap Growth F (SIMT)
REQTX46.860.33
+0.71%
Russell Sustnbl Aware Eq S
NCGFX68.340.47
+0.69%
New Covenant Growth
FCNSX18.50-0.08
-0.43%
Fidelity Series Canada

GSHRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GSHRF and LGDTF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GSHRF and LGDTF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GSHRF
1D Price
Change %
GSHRF100%
-3.12%
LGDTF - GSHRF
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.75%
LOMLF - GSHRF
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.76%
HSTXF - GSHRF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.37%
TORXF - GSHRF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.19%
IEGCF - GSHRF
22%
Poorly correlated
+6.43%
More

IEGCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IEGCF and AUMBF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IEGCF and AUMBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IEGCF
1D Price
Change %
IEGCF100%
+6.43%
AUMBF - IEGCF
27%
Poorly correlated
-2.62%
EDVMF - IEGCF
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.19%
MMRGF - IEGCF
25%
Poorly correlated
-2.51%
FDMIF - IEGCF
24%
Poorly correlated
-5.79%
JAGGF - IEGCF
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.65%
More